Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
IT Confidence Ticks Down
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
1/24/2016 | 2:14:42 PM
Re: Advanced?
Even aside from more offensive cybersecurity stances, there is a need for greater proactivity overall when it comes to InfoSec, security policies, and other related risk management issues.  The better prepared you are not only for prevent attacks but also for the eventual successful attack, the better able you are to prevent, lessen, or mitigate damage.
RetiredUser
RetiredUser,
User Rank: Ninja
1/24/2016 | 1:33:18 AM
Re: Advanced?
I would tend to agree that volume and availability of "old hat" techniques and tools is more a problem than innovation in the styles of intrusion programming.  However, this is just looking at the larger body of "common" attacks.  There is a whole new level of intrusion and data acquisition techniques, programming methodologies and experimental programming happening that Enterprise IT sorely needs to become acquainted with.  We imagine the most creative hacking occurs only when the targets are government, infrastructure and financial institutions, but in fact many of these programs and techniques are first put up against Enterprise IT during the early release and testing stages.

I still believe InfoSec needs to change its model to one of offense in addition to defense, and data analytics are a huge piece of setting that stage.  But then, there also needs to be a resource on the Security team that has strong coding chops and can improvise, innovate and meet the skills of the less mundane attacks.  Seeing the model change, seeing more confidence on the part of the InfoSec team with a level of aggression added with the offensive shift - these are things that might help improve IT confidence in their Security functions.

 
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
1/22/2016 | 11:03:24 PM
Advanced?
"constantly advancing attack techniques"

Are these attack techniques and kits really more advanced, though?  All that's happening here is that the kits are becoming more widely distributed as pricing makes them more available to less-skilled attackers.  The attacks themselves though -- the code -- are often based upon "old [black] hat" (heh) techniques.

This is why some researchers are now using predictive analytics to anticipate what future attacks will look like.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Incorporating a Prevention Mindset into Threat Detection and Response
Threat detection and response systems, by definition, are reactive because they have to wait for damage to be done before finding the attack. With a prevention-mindset, security teams can proactively anticipate the attacker's next move, rather than reacting to specific threats or trying to detect the latest techniques in real-time. The report covers areas enterprises should focus on: What positive response looks like. Improving security hygiene. Combining preventive actions with red team efforts.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-22309
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-24
The POWER systems FSP is vulnerable to unauthenticated logins through the serial port/TTY interface. This vulnerability can be more critical if the serial port is connected to a serial-over-lan device. IBM X-Force ID: 217095.
CVE-2022-22495
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-24
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 226941.
CVE-2020-4926
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-24
A vulnerability in the Spectrum Scale 5.1 core component and IBM Elastic Storage System 6.1 could allow unauthorized access to user data or injection of arbitrary data in the communication protocol. IBM X-Force ID: 191600.
CVE-2013-10002
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-24
A vulnerability was found in Telecommunication Software SAMwin Contact Center Suite 5.1. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function getCurrentDBVersion in the library SAMwinLIBVB.dll of the credential handler. Authentication is possible with hard-coded credentials. Upgradi...
CVE-2013-10003
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-24
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Telecommunication Software SAMwin Contact Center Suite 5.1. This affects the function getCurrentDBVersion in the library SAMwinLIBVB.dll of the database handler. The manipulation leads to sql injection. The exploit has been disclosed to the pu...