Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Re-innovating Static Analysis: 4 Steps
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
KevGreene_Cyber
KevGreene_Cyber,
User Rank: Author
12/15/2015 | 2:33:16 PM
Re: The *term* static analysis should die
Jeff... that's not the case.  I think there are ways (we have been exploring) to correlate and bring disparate results together; as well as the context of various security testing activiites -- see ASTAM.  So.. we have already explored new ways to bring results together.. I think we are moving in the right direction.  Lots of exciting things to come... Thanks for reading...
planetlevel
planetlevel,
User Rank: Author
12/15/2015 | 12:26:30 PM
The *term* static analysis should die
Hi Kevin - nice article.  Just wanted to check if you thought it was me suggesting static analysis is dead -- which I don't.  I have written that the *term* static analysis should die.  At least for security.  I think I've been clear that I use and trust static analysis for many types of code quality analysis.

http://www.contrastsecurity.com/blog/why-its-time-for-the-terms-static-analysis-and-dynamic-analysis-to-die

The basic idea is that it's the information -- the context -- available to the tool that matters, not the fact that it happens to be static, dynamic, interactive, runtime, or whatever.  We should be talking about whether a tool has access to accurate data flow, backend connections, http requests/responses, libraries/frameworks, etc...  That's what tools need to start getting accurate.

And I want to be clear. This isn't about correlating the results of single-approach tools. My experience is that it's very difficult to accurately correlate.  And even if you do, you lose the "sweet spots" that were only found by one tool and so didn't correlate with anything.  I'm talking about merging the analysis techniques themselves into a single tool - so that the analysis engine itself can use a broad range of contextual information when identifying vulnerabilities.

Static analysis is a key security technology. But in my view needs the information from other security analysis approaches closely integrated during analysis.  I look forward to seeing the results of the STAMP.

 

 

 
KevGreene_Cyber
KevGreene_Cyber,
User Rank: Author
12/14/2015 | 1:13:09 PM
Re: nice post
Thanks for the support.  Much appreciated.. 
Poissonpraveen
Poissonpraveen,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/11/2015 | 8:03:51 AM
nice post
nice post and good peice of information and keep it bro...


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Black Hat USA 2022 Attendee Report
Black Hat attendees are not sleeping well. Between concerns about attacks against cloud services, ransomware, and the growing risks to the global supply chain, these security pros have a lot to be worried about. Read our 2022 report to hear what they're concerned about now.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-38235
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
XPDF commit ffaf11c was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via DCTStream::getChar() at /xpdf/Stream.cc.
CVE-2022-38236
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
XPDF commit ffaf11c was discovered to contain a global-buffer overflow via Lexer::getObj(Object*) at /xpdf/Lexer.cc.
CVE-2022-38237
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
XPDF commit ffaf11c was discovered to contain a heap-buffer overflow via DCTStream::readScan() at /xpdf/Stream.cc.
CVE-2022-38238
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
XPDF commit ffaf11c was discovered to contain a heap-buffer overflow via DCTStream::lookChar() at /xpdf/Stream.cc.
CVE-2022-36141
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
SWFMill commit 53d7690 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via SWF::MethodBody::write(SWF::Writer*, SWF::Context*).