Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Startup Offers Free Cyberattack Simulation Service
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
jeromeo1969
50%
50%
jeromeo1969,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/9/2017 | 2:22:26 PM
Excellent!
This dovetails nicely into what I have thought all along. Penetration Testing shouldn't be a twice a year endeavor, instead Red Teams should be constantly attacking the environments they are protecting. There is no such thing as a static environment, and new vulnerabilities are being found all the time!
danelleau1
50%
50%
danelleau1,
User Rank: Strategist
12/9/2015 | 2:35:51 PM
Re: Cyberattack Simulation Service
theb0x - I understand your question now. You are correct, it would not make sense to simulate "reconnaissance". But reconnaissance isn't the only way to attack an organization, i.e. insider threats etc. It is important to validate lateral movement and data exfiltration as well.

As for the architecture, there are various deployment options available. The SaaS model is the vThreat model, talk to Marcus. We (SafeBreach) have an on-premise model that doesn't require SaaS. Happy to chat offline. 
theb0x
50%
50%
theb0x,
User Rank: Ninja
12/9/2015 | 9:57:06 AM
Re: Cyberattack Simulation Service
The first phase of any cyberattack is always reconnaissance. This is public information gathered about the company. The second phase is enumeration. This where systems can be port scanned and the querying of individual services are performed to identify specific systems of weaknesses. It is not until the exploition phase is launched where the information identified as weaknesses can actually be confirmed. 

A simulation of this does not really confirm any weaknesses discovered. There is also a high probability of false positives.

A cyberattack does not involve deploying SaaS agents internally to the network to gather information. This is not how reconnaissance and enumeration are performed. Also loading such an agent may very well be exploitable by an actual attack through it's own weaknesses. 

 

danelleau1
50%
50%
danelleau1,
User Rank: Strategist
12/9/2015 | 4:00:18 AM
Re: Cyberattack Simulation Service
It's different from vulnerability assessment. Here you are simulating the actions of an attacker, and the breach methods used may or may not take advantage of a vulnerability. It's more like an automated red team on a platform. 
theb0x
50%
50%
theb0x,
User Rank: Ninja
12/8/2015 | 12:27:01 PM
Cyberattack Simulation Service
How is this any different than a vulnerability assessment? No exploits are actually launched and the probable damage is based on the value of a company's assests and the severity of a successful attack. That's what CVEs are for. Even running scans on a production network can have a negative impact depending on how many nodes and how aggressive it is. Even without using any exploit code things can and will still break.
Sara Peters
50%
50%
Sara Peters,
User Rank: Author
12/4/2015 | 11:35:55 AM
Good news for SMBs
This is something that SMBs could actually afford, and might teach them more about security than the average static monitoring software. But it could also be good for the larger companies if they actually do use it as an "in-between pen tests" maintenance tool. 
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
12/3/2015 | 5:36:28 AM
Counter to M&M Security
Sounds like a great service lest we become to complacent about M&M security (hard on the outside, soft inside).  Security is not just about the outer gates; it's about everything that happens within the walls as well.
danelleau1
50%
50%
danelleau1,
User Rank: Strategist
12/2/2015 | 4:26:30 PM
Attack Validation
If attackers are being successful, it makes sense to play that role. Attack validation allows organizations to adopt an offensive security mindset in the right way (i.e. without the implications and potential legal backlash from fighting back against attackers), and complements existing security solutions. 


News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-20327
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
A specific version of the Node.js mongodb-client-encryption module does not perform correct validation of the KMS server’s certificate. This vulnerability in combination with a privileged network position active MITM attack could result in interception of traffic between the Node....
CVE-2021-20328
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Specific versions of the Java driver that support client-side field level encryption (CSFLE) fail to perform correct host name verification on the KMS server’s certificate. This vulnerability in combination with a privileged network position active MITM attack could result in inte...
CVE-2020-27543
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
The restify-paginate package 0.0.5 for Node.js allows remote attackers to cause a Denial-of-Service by omitting the HTTP Host header. A Restify-based web service would crash with an uncaught exception.
CVE-2020-23534
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Upgrade.php of gopeak masterlab 2.1.5, via the 'source' parameter.
CVE-2021-27330
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Triconsole Datepicker Calendar <3.77 is affected by cross-site scripting (XSS) in calendar_form.php. Attackers can read authentication cookies that are still active, which can be used to perform further attacks such as reading browser history, directory listings, and file contents.