Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
'HIPAA Not Helping': Healthcare's Software Security Lagging
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Dan9126
50%
50%
Dan9126,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/12/2016 | 3:33:42 PM
Healthcare security
The problem seems to me not to be one of training, but of managerial well. Remediation of known vulnerabilities is frequently hampered by management fear that services will be interrupted, compounded by vendors who are completely unwilling to patch software current. Add to this woman and unwillingness to budget for an infrastructure that can keep these things safely managed and monitored, and you have our current train wreck.
GaryM2712105
100%
0%
GaryM2712105,
User Rank: Strategist
10/23/2015 | 9:22:35 AM
Re: RE Bug Bounty for Healthcare
That does seem like a reasonable way to look at it.  FWIW, we only added bug bounty as an activity to the BSIMM in BSIMM-V (oct 2013) when it began to appear.  Remember, BSIMM only describes what is actually going on out there.  

 

In my view, the bug bounty hype these days is outstripping bug bounty reality on the ground.  But bug bounty systems are growing.

gem
jason.haddix
50%
50%
jason.haddix,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/23/2015 | 12:36:59 AM
RE Bug Bounty for Healthcare
Very peculiar... Aetna says no bug bounty yet Synack IS a crowdsourced security vendor, a bug bounty program. They use that terminology themselves when it benefits them. Google the Forbes Article called: Synack Crowdsourcing Bug Bounty

www.forbes.com/video/3775809296001 

BSIMM6 seems great but might need to do some due diligence on the definitions of some vendors and success. I know many healthcare companies succeeding using bug bounty programs. Their ROI is outstanding vs traditional security consulting.
kim1green
50%
50%
kim1green,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/23/2015 | 12:12:03 AM
Re: Bug bounties and healthcare
Let's look at the data in another way. One or two years ago the number of bug bounty programs was likely zero, indicating the number of implemented programs will continue to grow. I do know several current members are looking to implement private bug bounty programs. Acknowledging that it remains challenging to implement bug bounty programs in healthcare because companies are reluctant to expose public facing systems that contain PHI. However, healthcare security leaders also recognize that their companies have many other critical systems that do not contain PHI and are looking to implement private bug bounty programs for these systems. The majority of security leaders that I speak to do see crowdsourcing in their company's future.
caseyjohnellis
50%
50%
caseyjohnellis,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/22/2015 | 11:52:31 PM
Re: Bug bounties and healthcare
"In our business of healthcare, it makes no sense at all"

Zephyr Health, one of the interviewed companies in BSIMM and a healthcare company, runs a bug bounty program... hence the comment about this statement being unusual

It clearly makes at least some sense, otherwise Cigital wouldn't have included such odd outlier in it's study.

Download the data for yourself ;)
GaryM2712105
100%
0%
GaryM2712105,
User Rank: Strategist
10/21/2015 | 9:17:58 PM
Re: Bug bounties and healthcare
According to BSIMM6 data, that is not the case.  Only 3 of 78 firms had a bug bounty system going when we measured them.

Download the data for yourself.
caseyjohnellis
100%
0%
caseyjohnellis,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/20/2015 | 7:21:00 PM
Bug bounties and healthcare
Jim Routh's comments are interesting given the Zephyr Health run a bug bounty program: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbW777t1tTA


Commentary
How SolarWinds Busted Up Our Assumptions About Code Signing
Dr. Jethro Beekman, Technical Director,  3/3/2021
News
'ObliqueRAT' Now Hides Behind Images on Compromised Websites
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  3/2/2021
News
Attackers Turn Struggling Software Projects Into Trojan Horses
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/26/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-21360
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-09
Products.GenericSetup is a mini-framework for expressing the configured state of a Zope Site as a set of filesystem artifacts. In Products.GenericSetup before version 2.1.1 there is an information disclosure vulnerability - anonymous visitors may view log and snapshot files generated by the Generic ...
CVE-2021-21361
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-09
The `com.bmuschko:gradle-vagrant-plugin` Gradle plugin contains an information disclosure vulnerability due to the logging of the system environment variables. When this Gradle plugin is executed in public CI/CD, this can lead to sensitive credentials being exposed to malicious actors. This is fixed...
CVE-2021-24033
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-09
react-dev-utils prior to v11.0.4 exposes a function, getProcessForPort, where an input argument is concatenated into a command string to be executed. This function is typically used from react-scripts (in Create React App projects), where the usage is safe. Only when this function is manually invoke...
CVE-2021-21510
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-08
Dell iDRAC8 versions prior to 2.75.100.75 contain a host header injection vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability by injecting arbitrary ‘Host’ header values to poison a web-cache or trigger redirections.
CVE-2020-27575
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-08
Maxum Rumpus 8.2.13 and 8.2.14 is affected by a command injection vulnerability. The web administration contains functionality in which administrators are able to manage users. The edit users form contains a parameter vulnerable to command injection due to insufficient validation.