Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
China, US Agree To Not Conduct Cyberespionage For Economic Gain
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
9/27/2015 | 11:07:18 PM
Oh boy
I also hear that, under the agreement, China has sold us the Brooklyn Bridge!
JerryLee3
JerryLee3,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/28/2015 | 10:24:03 AM
Re: Oh boy
I'm sure that they will honor this deal just as much as the US will...
RyanSepe
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 11:21:31 AM
Skeptical at best
I'll believe this when I see it. As the article states, its one thing to say your are going to do something but its whole thing entirely to actually follow through.
Dr.T
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 2:58:25 PM
Trust and verify
 

We can trust but not be able to verify this agreement. :--))

 
Dr.T
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 2:59:22 PM
Re: Oh boy
I would not be surprised if that really happened. :--))
Dr.T
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 3:01:34 PM
Re: Oh boy
Agree. If somehow it would not get done, they can build a new identical bridge and sell it with reduced price to the rest of the world. Creative minds :--))
Dr.T
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 3:03:09 PM
Re: Skeptical at best
Agree. There is a risk in all agreements between governments. There is really no enforcement on what they should be doing, at the end of the day it is voluntary.
Dr.T
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 3:05:45 PM
Better than nothing
 

Obviously some type of agreement is better than nothing, instead of going different direction there is a effort to find a common ground. Reality is that US is doing more to China than China to US.
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 11:55:26 PM
Re: Skeptical at best
And, besides, how long would it take of China forbearing (or, at least, appearing to forbear) before many of us actually come to trust them?
RyanSepe
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
9/29/2015 | 12:31:48 PM
Re: Skeptical at best
Never. Trust is something that is very hard to regain. Once you prove untrustworthy, IE been caught doing the thing you promise not to do, its impossible. One man's opinion.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Creating an Effective Incident Response Plan
Security teams are realizing their organizations will experience a cyber incident at some point. An effective incident response plan that takes into account their specific requirements and has been tested is critical. This issue of Tech Insights also includes: -a look at the newly signed cyber-incident law, -how organizations can apply behavioral psychology to incident response, -and an overview of the Open Cybersecurity Schema Framework.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-45909
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-26
drachtio-server 0.8.18 has a heap-based buffer over-read via a long Request-URI in an INVITE request.
CVE-2022-45907
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-26
In PyTorch before trunk/89695, torch.jit.annotations.parse_type_line can cause arbitrary code execution because eval is used unsafely.
CVE-2022-45908
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-26
In PaddlePaddle before 2.4, paddle.audio.functional.get_window is vulnerable to code injection because it calls eval on a user-supplied winstr. This may lead to arbitrary code execution.
CVE-2022-44843
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-25
TOTOlink A7100RU V7.4cu.2313_B20191024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the port parameter in the setting/setOpenVpnClientCfg function.
CVE-2022-44844
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-25
TOTOlink A7100RU V7.4cu.2313_B20191024 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the pass parameter in the setting/setOpenVpnCfg function.