Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Database Security
Authentication
Mobile
Privacy
Compliance
Careers and People
Identity & Access Management
Security Monitoring
Advanced Threats
Insider Threats
Vulnerability Management
Comments
China, US Agree To Not Conduct Cyberespionage For Economic Gain
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
 User Rank: Ninja
9/30/2015 | 9:10:08 PM
Re: Better than nothing
But, but but...we're the good guys!  :)
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
 User Rank: Ninja
9/29/2015 | 12:31:48 PM
Re: Skeptical at best
Never. Trust is something that is very hard to regain. Once you prove untrustworthy, IE been caught doing the thing you promise not to do, its impossible. One man's opinion.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
 User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 11:55:26 PM
Re: Skeptical at best
And, besides, how long would it take of China forbearing (or, at least, appearing to forbear) before many of us actually come to trust them?
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
 User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 3:05:45 PM
Better than nothing
 

Obviously some type of agreement is better than nothing, instead of going different direction there is a effort to find a common ground. Reality is that US is doing more to China than China to US.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
 User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 3:03:09 PM
Re: Skeptical at best
Agree. There is a risk in all agreements between governments. There is really no enforcement on what they should be doing, at the end of the day it is voluntary.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
 User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 3:01:34 PM
Re: Oh boy
Agree. If somehow it would not get done, they can build a new identical bridge and sell it with reduced price to the rest of the world. Creative minds :--))
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
 User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 2:59:22 PM
Re: Oh boy
I would not be surprised if that really happened. :--))
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
 User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 2:58:25 PM
Trust and verify
 

We can trust but not be able to verify this agreement. :--))

 
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
 User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 11:21:31 AM
Skeptical at best
I'll believe this when I see it. As the article states, its one thing to say your are going to do something but its whole thing entirely to actually follow through.
JerryLee3
50%
50%
JerryLee3,
 User Rank: Apprentice
9/28/2015 | 10:24:03 AM
Re: Oh boy
I'm sure that they will honor this deal just as much as the US will...
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Enterprises Are Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Environment
The adoption of cloud services spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in pressure on cyber-risk professionals to focus on vulnerabilities and new exposures that stem from pandemic-driven changes. Many cybersecurity pros expect fundamental, long-term changes to their organization's computing and data security due to the shift to more remote work and accelerated cloud adoption. Download this report from Dark Reading to learn more about their challenges and concerns.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-23031
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-25
On BIG-IP FPS, ASM, and Advanced WAF versions 16.1.x before 16.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.4, and 14.1.x before 14.1.4.4, an XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the F5 Advanced Web Application Firewall (Advanced WAF) and BIG-IP ASM Traffic Management User Interface (...
CVE-2022-23032
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-25
In all versions before 7.2.1.4, when proxy settings are configured in the network access resource of a BIG-IP APM system, connecting BIG-IP Edge Client on Mac and Windows is vulnerable to a DNS rebinding attack. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evalu...
CVE-2022-23008
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-25
On NGINX Controller API Management versions 3.18.0-3.19.0, an authenticated attacker with access to the "user" or "admin" role can use undisclosed API endpoints on NGINX Controller API Management to inject JavaScript code that is executed on managed NGINX data plane instances. No...
CVE-2022-23009
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-25
On BIG-IQ Centralized Management 8.x before 8.1.0, an authenticated administrative role user on a BIG-IQ managed BIG-IP device can access other BIG-IP devices managed by the same BIG-IQ system. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
CVE-2022-23010
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-25
On BIG-IP versions 16.x before 16.1.0, 15.1.x before 15.1.4.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.4, and all versions of 13.1.x, 12.1.x, and 11.6.x, when a FastL4 profile and an HTTP profile are configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause an increase in memory resource utilization. Note: Softwa...