Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Healthcare Organizations Twice As Likely To Experience Data Theft
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
10/11/2015 | 8:16:13 PM
Re: A cost effective approach
"Attackers are always looking for a cost effective approach."

Indeed, security research indicates that attackers -- like "defenders" -- are lazy, and constantly recycle code.  One security research company in Israel focuses on using predictive analytics to predict -- and defend against -- new attacks based upon old attacks and old malware and old software.
lynnbr2
50%
50%
lynnbr2,
User Rank: Strategist
10/1/2015 | 1:22:21 PM
Re: A cost effective approach
I agree the article "perfectly focused the point," and it was in the very first sentence where Sara said that "healthcare not very willing to invest in defending it."

Look, if I'm the CIO or CISO and I go the CEO and say "the state of our security is an unknown-unknown" (to channel Don Rumsfeld), I'll likely be replaced in the next quarter after the CEO's executive search committee comes back with some candidates. Ok, suppose the CEO is a good guy, and allows the CISO to continue. (I'll defer the discussion of just how many CEOs are good guys to Matthew 19:24?) So next the CISO has to tell the CEO just how large a honeypot of $ he needs to secure things, and over what time period. Then the CEO has to get buy-in from the rest of the C-suite and the board. But time flies, and that money is spent and gone now, and regardless of whether the CISO squashed 15 vulns, 150 vulns, or 500 vulns, the state of security is still an unknown-unknown? Well, for sure the executive search committee is getting back in session. The CEO isn't ready yet to add this new, never ending, ever expanding cost into the companies' 10-K statements, when legal is telling him they're covered. One persons cost effective approach is another persons business tax.

 
Enrico Fontan
50%
50%
Enrico Fontan,
User Rank: Strategist
10/1/2015 | 12:03:02 PM
A cost effective approach
I think the article perfectly focused the point:

"The end result is that attackers are far more willing to invest in stealing medical records than healthcare institutions are willing to invest in protecting them from being stolen."

Attackers are always looking for a cost effective approach. Healthcare institutions have to focus on system security and staff training (secure the human) if they plan to minimize such attacks.
lynnbr2
50%
50%
lynnbr2,
User Rank: Strategist
10/1/2015 | 9:57:09 AM
Re: Healthcare is unique
Well, if you want to believe that healthcare is unique, go right ahead if that makes you feel better. But next time you go to the doctor's office or hospital, don't look too closely at that stack of six or nine papers they make you sign before you get to go past that locked door in the waiting room and actually see the doc.

Spoiler alert! Big Data is all about your healthcare records, already. Best that you don't look into MIB, Optum, Milliman, and their ilk, and their associated "members". This means there is already online, daily, trending to near real time, inter-company trading of your healthcare "data."

I like how MIB has a rebuttal statement pre-prepared at their website - cause they're just waiting for you to check them out - "...relying on unverifiable statements that may or may not have been made in the 1970's, 80's and 90's...we ask that you "take them with a grain of salt."" While Millimam's US home page even shows up with a website https certificate error.

Welcome to the 21st century of healthcare.

 
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
9/30/2015 | 9:15:39 PM
Re: Healthcare is unique
Worth pointing out that encryption at rest, while useful, is hardly a complete solution -- as security pundits pointed out in the wake of the Anthem brouhaha.  After all, if access and keys are compromised, so too is the encryption, and -- with it -- the data.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
9/30/2015 | 9:13:28 PM
Re: Healthcare is unique
> One solution to this problem it to identify players in the black market,

Indeed, that seems to be the perennial goal...

> if I am guessing I will goes that we may find big insurance companies behind it.

...although I don't carry quite the same conspiracy theory.  :)
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/29/2015 | 12:42:40 PM
Re: Healthcare is unique
One more thing, one way to make it uses for the hackers is to encrypt it at rest, they may get the data but not be able to decrypt and utilize it.  Unless you are NSA of course :--))).
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/29/2015 | 12:39:27 PM
Re: Healthcare is unique
One solution to this problem it to identify players in the black market, if I am guessing I will goes that we may find big insurance companies behind it.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/29/2015 | 12:36:47 PM
Re: Healthcare is unique
Agree. It is actually sad that there is a black market on health data. If it was just a public record there would have been much less prpblem.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/29/2015 | 12:33:39 PM
Healthcare privacy
 

Healthcare data is target simply because it is kept private, if it was a public record it would not be  a target.

 

 
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/21/2020
Cybersecurity Bounces Back, but Talent Still Absent
Simone Petrella, Chief Executive Officer, CyberVista,  9/16/2020
Meet the Computer Scientist Who Helped Push for Paper Ballots
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Latest Comment: Exactly
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-4590
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 20.0.0.9 running oauth-2.0 or openidConnectServer-1.0 server features is vulnerable to a denial of service attack conducted by an authenticated client. IBM X-Force ID: 184650.
CVE-2020-4731
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
IBM Aspera Web Application 1.9.14 PL1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 188055.
CVE-2020-4315
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
IBM Business Automation Content Analyzer on Cloud 1.0 does not set the secure attribute on authorization tokens or session cookies. Attackers may be able to get the cookie values by sending a http:// link to a user or by planting this link in a site the user goes to. The cookie will be sent to the i...
CVE-2020-4579
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
IBM DataPower Gateway 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.12 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service by sending a specially crafted HTTP/2 request with invalid characters. IBM X-Force ID: 184438.
CVE-2020-4580
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
IBM DataPower Gateway 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.12 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service by sending a specially crafted a JSON request with invalid characters. IBM X-Force ID: 184439.