Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IBM Advises Businesses To Block Tor
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Ninja
8/27/2015 | 11:12:39 AM
Re: blocking the ingress to TOR does not protect you
I prefer TOR still being option for users, that is about privacy not about security.
User Rank: Ninja
8/27/2015 | 10:53:10 AM
Re: Nice one
I agree. The information provided in this article is quite informative. Good to know what IBM's strategy is.
User Rank: Ninja
8/27/2015 | 10:50:28 AM
Re: blocking the ingress to TOR does not protect you
I agree with this. Solution is not blocking a web site, it has to be a set of security measure to be put in place in a multi layered approach.
User Rank: Ninja
8/27/2015 | 10:39:15 AM
Why remove TOR?
Another point TOR itself is not a problem, it is not really important who was the source of the threat in most cases, what is important is that that source was not able to penetrate into your systems.
User Rank: Ninja
8/27/2015 | 10:31:55 AM
SLQ Injection?
There are very proven ways to protect yourself from SQL injections, it does not need to be vulnerable in any environment in today's world. SQL stands for Structured query language, so when you structured it properly not injection is possible.
User Rank: Ninja
8/26/2015 | 9:19:29 AM
blocking the ingress to TOR does not protect you
I don't see how a url block would do anything to protect you from an attack that comes via TOR exit nodes.

The IBM report states that you can get a list of exit nodes to block, but the exit nodes do in fact change daily or at the very least monthly.  People running exit nodes have nothing to do with an attack that originates from within TOR so why would you block them?

In my opinion the mitigation for this issue is not resolved, and the advice to block the ingress URL will not protect you in any way.

User Rank: Apprentice
8/26/2015 | 6:44:50 AM
Nice one
Loce it. Thanks. Nice one. 

I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Improving Enterprise Cybersecurity With XDR
Enterprises are looking at eXtended Detection and Response technologies to improve their abilities to detect, and respond to, threats. While endpoint detection and response is not new to enterprise security, organizations have to improve network visibility, expand data collection and expand threat hunting capabilites if they want their XDR deployments to succeed. This issue of Tech Insights also includes: a market overview for XDR from Omdia, questions to ask before deploying XDR, and an XDR primer.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-30
In Das U-Boot through 2022.07-rc5, an integer signedness error and resultant stack-based buffer overflow in the "i2c md" command enables the corruption of the return address pointer of the do_i2c_md function.
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-29
The firmware of EDIMAX IC-3140W Version 3.11 is hardcoded with Administrator username and password.
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-29
Joy ebike Wolf Manufacturing year 2022 is vulnerable to Denial of service, which allows remote attackers to jam the key fob request via RF.
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-29
Online Railway Reservation System v1.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the id parameter at /classes/Master.php?f=delete_service.
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-29
Code Injection in GitHub repository getgrav/grav prior to 1.7.34.