Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-29376PUBLISHED: 2022-05-23Xampp for Windows v8.1.4 and below was discovered to contain insecure permissions for its install directory, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code via overwriting binaries located in the directory.
CVE-2022-30015PUBLISHED: 2022-05-23In Simple Food Website 1.0, a moderation can put the Cross Site Scripting Payload in any of the fields on http://127.0.0.1:1234/food/admin/all_users.php like Full Username, etc .This causes stored xss.
CVE-2022-28999PUBLISHED: 2022-05-23Insecure permissions in the install directories and binaries of Dev-CPP v4.9.9.2 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via overwriting the binary devcpp.exe.
CVE-2022-29002PUBLISHED: 2022-05-23A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in XXL-Job v2.3.0 allows attackers to arbitrarily create administrator accounts via the component /gaia-job-admin/user/add.
CVE-2022-31489PUBLISHED: 2022-05-23Inout Blockchain AltExchanger 1.2.1 allows index.php/home/about inoutio_language cookie SQL injection.
User Rank: Apprentice
9/24/2015 | 12:58:29 PM
Of course there would be pushback ... unless the developer is compensated for secure code.
But what if accurate application security vulnerabilities could be identified before code check-in without any of the steps mentioned above? What if the applciation security vulnerabilities were identified simply from the FUNCTIONAL development and usage of the system?
As a former developer (and current AppSec tooling guy), I am always looking for ways to invisibly inject security into the SDLC ... ways that do NOT require a new line item in a project plan, an extra step in the coding / development process, or a self-imposed "wait state" in order to get application security results ... and, ideally, to have appication security vulnerabilities identified continuously and in real-time as an invisible and natural by-product of the process of building and testing software in an SDLC without regard for "Security Testing".
I have found that passive IAST products are capable of achieving this goal and not only enabling developers to identify and fix their vulnerabilities before the code leaves their desktop, but actually proactively reaching out to them to show the exact line of code that is vulnerable ... ALL WITHOUT A SCAN or extra step ... all in real-time from performing the very act that all developers do before checking in code ... FUNCTIONAL sanity/smoke testing.
Contrast Security provides such a solution.