Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-39229PUBLISHED: 2021-09-20
Apprise is an open source library which allows you to send a notification to almost all of the most popular notification services available. In affected versions users who use Apprise granting them access to the IFTTT plugin (which just comes out of the box) are subject to a denial of service attack...
CVE-2021-41083PUBLISHED: 2021-09-20
Dada Mail is a web-based e-mail list management system. In affected versions a bad actor could give someone a carefully crafted web page via email, SMS, etc, that - when visited, allows them control of the list control panel as if the bad actor was logged in themselves. This includes changing any ma...
CVE-2021-34650PUBLISHED: 2021-09-20The eID Easy WordPress plugin is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the error parameter found in the ~/admin.php file which allows attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts, in versions up to and including 4.6.
CVE-2021-41082PUBLISHED: 2021-09-20
Discourse is a platform for community discussion. In affected versions any private message that includes a group had its title and participating user exposed to users that do not have access to the private messages. However, access control for the private messages was not compromised as users were n...
CVE-2020-16630PUBLISHED: 2021-09-20
TI’s BLE stack caches and reuses the LTK’s property for a bonded mobile. A LTK can be an unauthenticated-and-no-MITM-protection key created by Just Works or an authenticated-and-MITM-protection key created by Passkey Entry, Numeric Comparison or OOB. Assume that...
Enterprise Cybersecurity Plans in a Post-Pandemic WorldDownload the Enterprise Cybersecurity Plans in a Post-Pandemic World report to understand how security leaders are maintaining pace with pandemic-related challenges, and where there is room for improvement.
Incident Readiness and Building Response Playbook
In this special report, learn the Xs and Os of any good security incident readiness and response playbook.
Tweet This
0 Comments
User Rank: Author
8/18/2015 | 9:16:27 AM
I understand a legacy tool vendor attempting to criticize a newer better technology to try to maintain market share. It's very easy to verify that IAST performs considerably better in both vulnerability coverage and accuracy (see the OWASP Benchmark Project).
But the implication that static analysis (SAST) is better for experts is ridiculous. I know dozens of companies that have large teams of people whose entire job is to triage false positives. We need that expertise focused on threat modeling, security architecture, and implementing defenses.... not "onboarding" and triage.