Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

A Threat Intelligence-Sharing Reality-Check
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Moderator
5/28/2015 | 8:54:19 AM
Over complicated
Re: Soltra Edge

This technology is just too over-complicated for the average Security Analyst to deal with.  The instructions for setting it up need significant attention as they were written by one of the products developers resulting in huge gaps, assumptions, and general lack of user friendliness.  The spelling and grammar in the instructions need some serious love as well. 

Here is why I am being so critical...

I've had two of my analysts at two different companies go through the process of setting up Soltra Edge.  It was very, very painful.  Both are very sharp cookies and highly skilled in all things Linux.  It was not a skill issue.  They have been well trained and are very experienced in Security Operations (SecOps).  It was not a knowledge issue.  They did get the product running in the end only to sit there and say "now what".  It was sad because the closer they got to finishing the set up the instructions became less and less useable.  Very poorly written.

It's a product immaturity issue...

The last but most important issue is time.  The vast majority of SecOps teams do not have staff just sitting around waiting for something to do.  Show me such a place and I will show you failed leadership.  SecOps staff are very overwhelmed these days and when you throw such an immature product at them, describing it as the next best thing since sliced bread, only to waste that Security Analysts time trying to get it working, even minimally, then you have lost all those hours spent working on it.  Those hours would have been better spent working on real world threat analysis and response.

Again, it's a product immaturity issue with a very strong dose of marketing spin added in.

I really dislike what marketing has done to SecOps programs these past few years.  The marketing spin and effort to convince Security Managers to "buy this, buy this" by vendors, product marketing, and even open source stuff like Soltra Edge, adds an unnecessary burden, a layer of noise that take SecOps staff away from what really matters.  Stopping the bad guy, here and now.

All this being said...  I agree we need much better, faster delivered and shareable threat intel.  No argument.  But stop pushing an immature product/capability down SecOps throats, especially via regulatory bodies who have no technical clue into what it takes to really protect against the bad guys, but are all hyped up on this new slice of bread.

Slow it down.  Do it right!  And for heaven's sake never, ever let a developer create the user interface OR the setup instructions!

Rgr Out!

Virginia a Hot Spot For Cybersecurity Jobs
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  10/9/2019
How to Think Like a Hacker
Dr. Giovanni Vigna, Chief Technology Officer at Lastline,  10/10/2019
7 SMB Security Tips That Will Keep Your Company Safe
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  10/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in admin/translate/translateheader_view.php in LimeSurvey 3.19.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the tolang parameter, as demonstrated by the index.php/admin/translate/sa/index/surveyid/336819/lang/ PATH_INFO.
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
Pivotal RabbitMQ, versions prior to v3.7.18, and RabbitMQ for PCF, versions 1.15.x prior to 1.15.13, versions 1.16.x prior to 1.16.6, and versions 1.17.x prior to 1.17.3, contain two components, the virtual host limits page, and the federation management UI, which do not properly sanitize user input...
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
The broken-link-checker plugin through 1.11.8 for WordPress (aka Broken Link Checker) is susceptible to Reflected XSS due to improper encoding and insertion of an HTTP GET parameter into HTML. The filter function on the page listing all detected broken links can be exploited by providing an XSS payl...
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
The eu-cookie-law plugin through 3.0.6 for WordPress (aka EU Cookie Law (GDPR)) is susceptible to Stored XSS due to improper encoding of several configuration options in the admin area and the displayed cookie consent message. This affects Font Color, Background Color, and the Disable Cookie text. A...
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
The events-manager plugin through 5.9.5 for WordPress (aka Events Manager) is susceptible to Stored XSS due to improper encoding and insertion of data provided to the attribute map_style of shortcodes (locations_map and events_map) provided by the plugin.