Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-30333PUBLISHED: 2022-05-09RARLAB UnRAR before 6.12 on Linux and UNIX allows directory traversal to write to files during an extract (aka unpack) operation, as demonstrated by creating a ~/.ssh/authorized_keys file. NOTE: WinRAR and Android RAR are unaffected.
CVE-2022-23066PUBLISHED: 2022-05-09
In Solana rBPF versions 0.2.26 and 0.2.27 are affected by Incorrect Calculation which is caused by improper implementation of sdiv instruction. This can lead to the wrong execution path, resulting in huge loss in specific cases. For example, the result of a sdiv instruction may decide whether to tra...
CVE-2022-28463PUBLISHED: 2022-05-08ImageMagick 7.1.0-27 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow.
CVE-2022-28470PUBLISHED: 2022-05-08marcador package in PyPI 0.1 through 0.13 included a code-execution backdoor.
CVE-2022-1620PUBLISHED: 2022-05-08NULL Pointer Dereference in function vim_regexec_string at regexp.c:2729 in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4901. NULL Pointer Dereference in function vim_regexec_string at regexp.c:2729 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted input.
User Rank: Apprentice
8/23/2016 | 11:56:49 AM
The previous article I saw on this site was an article about "diversity" - but in the pictures were 100% women?!?!? Cleary, diveristy has less to do with including everyone and more to do with eliminating men, and even caucasions in some cases.
When I was at university, the history department's hiring practives were being investigated since almost all of the professors were white males. In my department - engineering - all of the professors were Indian males. Guess what?? No investigation.
You tell me.
As a woman, I recognise that there are simply going to be professions that are mostly women, and others that are mostly men. That has been the case since the beginning of history. Oh yeah and about not getting resumes from women - notice how it wasn't even questioned? The one time I heard a male manager state that he wan't receiving resumes from women the immediate response was that he is clearly a liar and in reality didn't pay attenion to all the resumes he received from women.
Why the different responses to the manager based on their gender?
Again, you tell me.