Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Database Security
Authentication
Mobile
Privacy
Compliance
Careers and People
Identity & Access Management
Security Monitoring
Advanced Threats
Insider Threats
Vulnerability Management
Comments
Defense Secretary Outlines New Cybersecurity Strategy
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli,
 User Rank: Ninja
4/30/2015 | 11:34:08 PM
Re: Don’t Let Bureaucracy Hinder Progress
...not that the federal government is known for adhering to its own self-imposed tech guidelines (see, e.g., IPv6 compliance).
RetiredUser
RetiredUser,
 User Rank: Ninja
4/24/2015 | 2:55:21 PM
Don’t Let Bureaucracy Hinder Progress
I finally read the whole DoD cyber strategy.  Of particular interest (and a section I feel should have its own extensive document) is STRATEGIC GOAL III: BE PREPARED TO DEFEND THE U.S. HOMELAND AND U.S. VITAL INTERESTS FROM DISRUPTIVE OR DESTRUCTIVE CYBERATTACKS OF SIGNIFICANT CONSEQUENCE.

One point made within that section is:

* "Assess DoD's cyber deterrence posture and strategy. - Building off of the Defense Science Board's Task Force on Cyber Deterrence, U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM), in coordination with the Joint Staff and the Office of the Secretary of Defense, will assess the Department of Defense's ability to deter specific state and non-state actors from conducting cyberattacks of significant consequence on the U.S. homeland and against U.S. interests, to include loss of life, significant destruction of property, or significant impact on U.S. foreign and economic policy interests." 

  - "In conducting its analysis, USSTRATCOM must determine whether DoD is building the capabilities required for attributing and deterring key threats from conducting such attacks and  recommend specific actions that DoD can take to improve its cyber deterrence posture. Careful attention should be devoted also to deterring non-state actors that may fall outside of   traditional deterrence frameworks but which could pose a considerable threat to U.S. interests."

As with all bureaucracy, action is hindered by deep audits and analysis - the verbiage here concerns me in that I translate this to be a multi-year effort.  I'd be interested in seeing actual timelines and whether there is an escalation process in place to reach the recommendations phase so that implementation could begin more quickly.  This initiative to me is the most critical, time-sensitive and policy-shaping for future work in information security technologies.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Machine Learning, AI & Deep Learning Improve Cybersecurity
Machine intelligence is influencing all aspects of cybersecurity. Organizations are implementing AI-based security to analyze event data using ML models that identify attack patterns and increase automation. Before security teams can take advantage of AI and ML tools, they need to know what is possible. This report covers: -How to assess the vendor's AI/ML claims -Defining success criteria for AI/ML implementations -Challenges when implementing AI
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-3296
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-25
Stack-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 9.0.0577.
CVE-2022-41340
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-24
The secp256k1-js package before 1.1.0 for Node.js implements ECDSA without required r and s validation, leading to signature forgery.
CVE-2022-23463
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-24
Nepxion Discovery is a solution for Spring Cloud. Discover is vulnerable to SpEL Injection in discovery-commons. DiscoveryExpressionResolver’s eval method is evaluating expression with a StandardEvaluationContext, allowing the expression to reach and interact with Java classes suc...
CVE-2022-23464
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-24
Nepxion Discovery is a solution for Spring Cloud. Discovery is vulnerable to a potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). RouterResourceImpl uses RestTemplate’s getForEntity to retrieve the contents of a URL containing user-controlled input, potentially resulting in Information...
CVE-2022-23461
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-24
Jodit Editor is a WYSIWYG editor written in pure TypeScript without the use of additional libraries. Jodit Editor is vulnerable to XSS attacks when pasting specially constructed input. This issue has not been fully patched. There are no known workarounds.