Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
DHS Courts Private Sector For Threat Intelligence-Sharing
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RetiredUser
50%
50%
RetiredUser,
User Rank: Ninja
4/27/2015 | 12:55:33 PM
Tit for Tat
I'm curious what would be required for an individual or business to gain access to this database, and whether it will be a free model or if this get commercialized. 

Only if the information remains free and open, and the organization itself transparent, will this fully succeed. 

The reason I raise the question of commercialization is that DHS has been sorely underfunded, with something like ~20 DHS projects identified by Congressional investigators as likely to fail or have poor outcomes.

If I recall correctly, a recent report from the Government Accountability Office documented DHS as planning to invest $10+ billion in acquisition programs.  With what money?

Look, if the Snowden effect means a little healthy distrust for Government, that's OK as long as the return on that is a more open Government willing to do tit-for-tat.  Let's see if this program is on the right track in two years and whether the database allows InfoSec as a whole in the US to make noticeable strides against cybercrime.

A good story and one we should all follow closely with great interest.
kbannan100
50%
50%
kbannan100,
User Rank: Moderator
4/24/2015 | 2:19:57 PM
Great news
This is truly great news for the entire security world. It will be interesting to see how it all plays out in the end, but it's certainly a good start. 

--KB
Karen J. Bannan, commenting on behalf of IDG and FireEye.


Commentary
What the FedEx Logo Taught Me About Cybersecurity
Matt Shea, Head of Federal @ MixMode,  6/4/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
A View From Inside a Deception
Sara Peters, Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/2/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-32552
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the openjdk-16 package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.
CVE-2021-32553
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the openjdk-17 package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.
CVE-2021-32554
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the xorg package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.
CVE-2021-32555
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the xorg-hwe-18.04 package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.
CVE-2021-32556
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that the get_modified_conffiles() function in backends/packaging-apt-dpkg.py allowed injecting modified package names in a manner that would confuse the dpkg(1) call.