Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Google Apps Security Beat By CloudFlare Hackers
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
GR8Day
50%
50%
GR8Day,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/6/2012 | 12:39:38 PM
re: Google Apps Security Beat By CloudFlare Hackers
I understand your thought but when I am at home I don't want to do this every single time, so I have designated smartphone, Home PC as a trusted device and that allows me to enter without the text code. So using my land line to receive the one-time PIN is kind of stupid. When I need to receive the code is when I am not at home, thus the idea of sending it to my mobile phone. That and my mobile phone is more secure than my cordless phone which is my land line. But as you stated, activating the two-Factor Authentication technology where you can telesign into your account by entering a one-time PIN code, is a Gǣprerequisite to any system that wants to promote itself as being secureGǥ, and is worth the time it takes to set it up and have the confidence that your account won't get hacked and your personal information isn't up for grabs.
TextPower
50%
50%
TextPower,
User Rank: Strategist
6/5/2012 | 5:56:41 PM
re: Google Apps Security Beat By CloudFlare Hackers
Two-factor authentication (2FA) is, at this point, a prerequisite to any system that wants to promote itself as being secure. However, 2FA systems can be violated if not properly designed.

The flaw in many 2FA systems is that the information G whether by voice or SMS G to validate an account is frequently sent *to* the userGs mobile number. This is a fundamental error because of the very problems illustrated in the article (e.g., calls being forwarded) and the possibility of the mobile having been cloned.

A 2FA system that reverses the process is inherently more secure than any other system available. A system designed so that the verification code is shown in open text on the web page *instead* of a field into which data (the code) can be entered is a better design. The code displayed must then be sent by the mobile that is associated with that account for verification and ONLY if that mobile (not a clone or a spoofed number G neither will work) sends the code is verification completed.

2FA systems arenGt perfect but utilizing the unique device ID of a mobile by reversing the process as described here, combined with a code and a PIN, reduces the likelihood of intrusion to an infinitesimal level.


Commentary
Ransomware Is Not the Problem
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
Edge-DRsplash-11-edge-ask-the-experts
How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
News
New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Zero Trust doesn't have to break your budget!
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-34812
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-18
Use of hard-coded credentials vulnerability in php component in Synology Calendar before 2.4.0-0761 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2021-34808
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-18
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in cgi component in Synology Media Server before 1.8.3-2881 allows remote attackers to access intranet resources via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2021-34809
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-18
Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('Command Injection') vulnerability in task management component in Synology Download Station before 3.8.16-3566 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2021-34810
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-18
Improper privilege management vulnerability in cgi component in Synology Download Station before 3.8.16-3566 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2021-34811
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-18
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in task management component in Synology Download Station before 3.8.16-3566 allows remote authenticated users to access intranet resources via unspecified vectors.