Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-44645PUBLISHED: 2023-01-31
In Apache Linkis <=1.3.0 when used with the MySQL Connector/J, a deserialization vulnerability with possible remote code execution impact exists when an attacker has write access to a database and configures new datasource with a MySQL data source and malicious parameters. Therefore, the paramete...
CVE-2023-0591PUBLISHED: 2023-01-31
ubireader_extract_files is vulnerable to path traversal when run against specifically crafted UBIFS files, allowing the attacker to overwrite files outside of the extraction directory (provided the process has write access to that file or directory). This is due to the fact that a node name (dent_no...
CVE-2023-0592PUBLISHED: 2023-01-31A path traversal vulnerability affects jefferson's JFFS2 filesystem extractor. By crafting malicious JFFS2 files, attackers could force jefferson to write outside of the extraction directory.This issue affects jefferson: before 0.4.1.
CVE-2023-0593PUBLISHED: 2023-01-31A path traversal vulnerability affects yaffshiv YAFFS filesystem extractor. By crafting a malicious YAFFS file, an attacker could force yaffshiv to write outside of the extraction directory. This issue affects yaffshiv up to version 0.1 included, which is the most recent at time of publication.
CVE-2023-24829PUBLISHED: 2023-01-31
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache IoTDB.This issue affects the iotdb-web-workbench component from 0.13.0 before 0.13.3. iotdb-web-workbench is an optional component of IoTDB, providing a web console of the database. This problem is fixed from version 0.13.3 o...
User Rank: Strategist
3/17/2015 | 9:34:47 PM
You have rights as a customer of organizations which failed basic security in their infrastructure. Basic prevention techniques could have made exploitation much more difficult. Do you think 1 year of credit monitoring will fully protect you? The answer it is not even remotely close to even the basic protection required. Identify theft may be the least of their worries. In some of these cases there are bank account numbers floating around.
This is getting to be a major confidence issue on the banking system.
At a minimum, I feel lifetime credit protection should be mandated, and the ability to pay for lifetime credit locks. That is the absolute most basic thing they should pay. What would that cost? Well, to lock credit reports is $5 or more for each one (at this time). In addition, if you want a loan or needed a credit check, you have to pay for unlocks. Is it your fault you need that unlock? Demand an adequate amount of money to pay for lifetime credit locks and unlocks and credit monitoring. Even with credit locks, the credit is opened for a window of time where others could exploit it. This is serious and corporations shouldn't be trying to weasel their way out of their liability by offering one year of credit monitoring.