Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Yahoo's One-Time Passwords Have Security Experts Divided
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
xmarksthespot
xmarksthespot,
User Rank: Strategist
3/22/2015 | 3:54:42 AM
One thing is for sure: it's an experiment
I value my own data enough to use 2 factor authentication.   I would like token+one time password .  No one offers it :(

I am a little bit concerned after watching so many hacking tutorials and reading so many security-related articles.  I've seen hackers in conference presentations say 'game over' way too many times.
Technocrati
Technocrati,
User Rank: Ninja
3/17/2015 | 12:46:54 PM
Re: you can have...

And I might add, Yahoo doesn't care. They hold no liability in the end.   I supposed that was the first thing they did when they recieved the venture capital years ago. That and to make sure the Chief Idiots were paid as well.

 

In the end, " It a privilege not a right to use Yahoo", just ask them.   And deep in the fine print, is the clause " Use at your own risk".

Technocrati
Technocrati,
User Rank: Ninja
3/17/2015 | 12:41:32 PM
Yahoo and Security 101

Everyone morning I wake up and hope Yahoo will finally get it and I am still waiting.

Security 101 Rule #1:  Never  have one point to have hackers focus on  - this is Security 101 Yahoooooo !   `

Maybe they should focus on all the hacker, scam infected emails that their servers allow rather than making it easier for them to attack anything that is Yahoo.

 

Sadly, I am going to wake up tomorrow with the same hope.  The streak continues.

Marilyn Cohodas
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
3/17/2015 | 8:46:02 AM
Re: you can have...
and that disruptive technology would have to combine.... security & ease of use. And so it goes!

 
Whoopty
Whoopty,
User Rank: Ninja
3/17/2015 | 7:58:49 AM
Re: you can have...
That's a problem though, as lack of ease of use is going to cause people not to bother, or sacrifice security in the name of that ease. 

Something new does need to be tried with security and authentication, as although two-factor is effective, I feel like that's a slope that leads to three factor and so on. We need a new, disruptive tech to give us the best of both worlds.

What this is though, I have no idea. 
Curt Franklin
Curt Franklin,
User Rank: Author
3/16/2015 | 6:30:05 PM
Re: you can have...
Tom, I absolutely agree that you've succinctly stated the way things have always been viewed in the security industry. If we're going to have better security with the much larger user base that computers and mobile devices now enjoy, though, we're going to have to be smart enough to have systems that are secure and easy for authorized users to use properly. If we can't do that, users will continue to choose ease over security and we're all well and truly in deep trouble.
Thomas Claburn
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Ninja
3/16/2015 | 5:59:51 PM
you can have...
...security or ease of use.

Choose one.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Black Hat USA 2022 Attendee Report
Black Hat attendees are not sleeping well. Between concerns about attacks against cloud services, ransomware, and the growing risks to the global supply chain, these security pros have a lot to be worried about. Read our 2022 report to hear what they're concerned about now.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-35942
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
Improper input validation on the `contains` LoopBack filter may allow for arbitrary SQL injection. When the extended filter property `contains` is permitted to be interpreted by the Postgres connector, it is possible to inject arbitrary SQL which may affect the confidentiality and integrity of data ...
CVE-2022-35949
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`undici` is vulnerable to SSRF (Server-side Request Forgery) when an application takes in **user input** into the `path/pathname` option of `undici.request`. If a user specifies a URL such as `http://127.0.0.1` or `//127.0.0.1` ```js con...
CVE-2022-35953
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
BookWyrm is a social network for tracking your reading, talking about books, writing reviews, and discovering what to read next. Some links in BookWyrm may be vulnerable to tabnabbing, a form of phishing that gives attackers an opportunity to redirect a user to a malicious site. The issue was patche...
CVE-2022-35956
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
This Rails gem adds two methods to the ActiveRecord::Base class that allow you to update many records on a single database hit, using a case sql statement for it. Before version 0.1.3 `update_by_case` gem used custom sql strings, and it was not sanitized, making it vulnerable to sql injection. Upgra...
CVE-2022-35943
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
Shield is an authentication and authorization framework for CodeIgniter 4. This vulnerability may allow [SameSite Attackers](https://canitakeyoursubdomain.name/) to bypass the [CodeIgniter4 CSRF protection](https://codeigniter4.github.io/userguide/libraries/security.html) mechanism with CodeIgniter ...