Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Hackers Breaking New Ground With Ransomware
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
xmarksthespot
50%
50%
xmarksthespot,
User Rank: Strategist
3/16/2015 | 8:29:35 PM
Re: Worry
Ransomware is bad for sure.  Offline backups are the last line of defense:  put important files on CDs, flash or external drive, and unplug the device when not in use.

I have been trying to find out ways to prevent this.  There is scant and conflicting evidence on a couple of sites.  One site says it does not self-propogate between systems over the internet.  It needs another program to send it, like a Trojan.  I was also reading the infection rate is low so far. 

Defense against ransomware in general:

1. Don't click on links in emails unless you expect that particular email, such as a confirmation to create an account.

2. Backup important data.

Another defense against most ransomware is antivirus software.  However, as stated in this article, this particular one evades antivirus by changing itself every time it's copied, making it harder to detect.
Whoopty
50%
50%
Whoopty,
User Rank: Ninja
3/16/2015 | 6:57:34 AM
Worry
Ransomware is just about the only piece of malware that worries me. The rest of it, at worst, I need to format my system and although there is the potential to lose some data or important information, chances are it can be recovered or the problems mitigated. When it comes to randomsware though, chances are your files are gone for good, as there is no guarantee that whoever you pay will unlock them for you, even if you do pay.

I have a pretty good system for back ups, but I would be mortified if I lose all of my personal pictures and memories. 


News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-3493
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
The overlayfs implementation in the linux kernel did not properly validate with respect to user namespaces the setting of file capabilities on files in an underlying file system. Due to the combination of unprivileged user namespaces along with a patch carried in the Ubuntu kernel to allow unprivile...
CVE-2021-3492
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
Shiftfs, an out-of-tree stacking file system included in Ubuntu Linux kernels, did not properly handle faults occurring during copy_from_user() correctly. These could lead to either a double-free situation or memory not being freed at all. An attacker could use this to cause a denial of service (ker...
CVE-2020-2509
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QTS and QuTS hero. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands in a compromised application. We have already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 4.5.2.1566 Build 20210202 and later Q...
CVE-2020-36195
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
An SQL injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QNAP NAS running Multimedia Console or the Media Streaming add-on. If exploited, the vulnerability allows remote attackers to obtain application information. QNAP has already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions of Multimedia C...
CVE-2021-29445
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
jose-node-esm-runtime is an npm package which provides a number of cryptographic functions. In versions prior to 3.11.4 the AES_CBC_HMAC_SHA2 Algorithm (A128CBC-HS256, A192CBC-HS384, A256CBC-HS512) decryption would always execute both HMAC tag verification and CBC decryption, if either failed `JWEDe...