Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Five Easiest Ways to Get Hacked Part 2
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
CarricDooley
50%
50%
CarricDooley,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/6/2015 | 6:11:41 PM
Re: Vulnerability Standpoint

This is a great question and it's something Amit discusses a bit in his Low Hanging Fruits: The Top Five Easiest Ways to Hack or Get Hacked whitepaper (link in blog). In my personal experience, SMB's tend to have almost zero awareness of the threats or their vulnerabilities. They don't really have a geek culture (unless the owner happens to be one) that really participates in the community, that lives and breathes this stuff. I think you can take an affordable approach to achieve SOME level of security. It doesn't take an enterprise-level effort or tool to secure an SMB.

From a purely vulnerability standpoint SMBs would typically look for high value in return for the time and money they invest. My suggestion is to use a scan policy that performs checks only for vulnerabilities, which have an exploit available, or alternatively you can filter the results of a full vulnerability scan to only those which have exploits. This would provide a shorter and more manageable list of actionable items, and you can start with addressing the critical/high risk findings first. Also, for an SMB it will be very valuable to invest in a software for patch management (including non-Microsoft patches), otherwise it becomes too big and discouraging of a problem to solve for most organizations. Lastly, SMBs should use a maturity model based approach to plan where they currently stand and where they would like to go. This would need a thorough understanding of what an organization is trying to protect, and what people, process and technology controls they can put in place to achieve the security level they would like.

Consider the following:

  • Nessus is $1,500/ year, and a very good tool used by almost everyone at all levels of security maturity. It helps find missing patches, default configurations and accounts, etc. For a homogeneous Windows environment (typical for SMB), the "Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer" is a reasonable start, and not so complicated that just a little IT know-how can't handle the tasks.
  • Microsoft now ships with some basic AV and anti-malware protection built-in, but it's not centrally manageable (less of a problem a problem for a small shop).

Some ISP's offer services to help filter e-mail as well so you might be subject fewer attacks on that vector as well. And, don't run or open anything you get that you don't absolutely trust... Also, having someone local (a small consultancy) help with setting baseline configurations for servers and workstations would help, and vendors provide a lot of guidance for both applications and the OS, especially since most small business these days run some version of Windows.

 

Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
3/2/2015 | 12:11:10 AM
Testing patches
An important yet oft overlooked aspect of a good patch management strategy: implement everything in a testbed first.  Test everything with everything.  Otherwise, you could really screw things up -- especially in a multi-vendor environment.

Verizon learned this lesson (so we might hope) the hard way last summer when its billing system suffered a multi-day outage because of its failure to test updates.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
2/26/2015 | 9:25:23 AM
Vulnerability Standpoint
From a vulnerability standpoint, it may be difficult to dedicate the bandwidth required for assessment and remediation.It's an ongoing process and is a multi-team faceted endeavor. What tips do you have for small to medium sized organizations that are trying to increase their security posture through their vulnerability remediation effort?


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Concerns over supply chain vulnerabilities and attack visibility drove some significant changes in enterprise cybersecurity strategies over the past year. Dark Reading's 2021 Strategic Security Survey showed that many organizations are staying the course regarding the use of a mix of attack prevention and threat detection technologies and practices for dealing with cyber threats.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-41150
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-19
Tough provides a set of Rust libraries and tools for using and generating the update framework (TUF) repositories. The tough library, prior to 0.12.0, does not properly sanitize delegated role names when caching a repository, or when loading a repository from the filesystem. When the repository is c...
CVE-2021-31378
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-19
In broadband environments, including but not limited to Enhanced Subscriber Management, (CHAP, PPP, DHCP, etc.), on Juniper Networks Junos OS devices where RADIUS servers are configured for managing subscriber access and a subscriber is logged in and then requests to logout, the subscriber may be fo...
CVE-2021-31379
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-19
An Incorrect Behavior Order vulnerability in the MAP-E automatic tunneling mechanism of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to send certain malformed IPv4 or IPv6 packets to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) to the PFE on the device which is disabled as a result of the processing of these pac...
CVE-2021-31380
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-19
A configuration weakness in the JBoss Application Server (AppSvr) component of Juniper Networks SRC Series allows a remote attacker to send a specially crafted query to cause the web server to disclose sensitive information in the HTTP response which allows the attacker to obtain sensitive informati...
CVE-2021-31381
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-19
A configuration weakness in the JBoss Application Server (AppSvr) component of Juniper Networks SRC Series allows a remote attacker to send a specially crafted query to cause the web server to delete files which may allow the attacker to disrupt the integrity and availability of the system.