Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-36312PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16Airspan AirVelocity 1500 software version 15.18.00.2511 lacks CSRF protections in the eNodeB's web management UI. This issue may affect other AirVelocity and AirSpeed models.
CVE-2022-38216PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
An integer overflow exists in Mapbox's closed source gl-native library prior to version 10.6.1, which is bundled with multiple Mapbox products including open source libraries. The overflow is caused by large image height and width values when creating a new Image and allows for out of bounds writes,...
CVE-2022-36306PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
An authenticated attacker can enumerate and download sensitive files, including the eNodeB's web management UI's TLS private key, the web server binary, and the web server configuration file. These vulnerabilities were found in AirVelocity 1500 running software version 9.3.0.01249, were still presen...
CVE-2022-36307PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16The AirVelocity 1500 prints SNMP credentials on its physically accessible serial port during boot. This was fixed in AirVelocity 1500 software version 15.18.00.2511 and may affect other AirVelocity and AirSpeed models.
CVE-2022-36308PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
Airspan AirVelocity 1500 web management UI displays SNMP credentials in plaintext on software versions older than 15.18.00.2511, and stores SNMPv3 credentials unhashed on the filesystem, enabling anyone with web access to use these credentials to manipulate the eNodeB over SNMP. This issue may affec...
User Rank: Ninja
2/23/2015 | 11:06:20 AM
In my opinion, the entire problem is laid bare in that statement. The biggest issue is that those so-called leaders are not really up to the task. Elected officials tend to grant important positions to political allies, or to those with whom they have had long associations. Very little consideration is given to the person's ability to actually perform the task given to them. In a political environment, politics rule decision making processes and that, in and of itself, almost rules out selection of the best qualified individual. In many instances, those leaders aspire to expand their empire and sphere of influence much more than to actually perform their assigned tasks. As far as the "held to the fire" part, that is usually an even worse scenario. I'm reminded of the old saying "if a person screws up, promote them". Political environments tend to glaze over mistakes with regularity, and with little consequence. We need only look at the various scandals and security issues in the federal government for examples, and it gets even worse as you start looking at state and local levels where those events get very little press. I hate to sound so cynical about this whole thing; I would love to hear what other people think about this.