Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
NFL Mobile Sports App Contains Super Bowl-Sized Vulns
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
aws0513
50%
50%
aws0513,
User Rank: Ninja
1/27/2015 | 9:34:27 AM
NFL Response?
Just curious if the NFL has any formal response to these findings about their app?  Any remediation efforts?
ODA155
50%
50%
ODA155,
User Rank: Ninja
1/27/2015 | 11:34:27 AM
Re: NFL Response?
@aws0513... here's your response...

...as a referee stands at mid-field and makes the announcement "Reports of possible vulnerabilities to man-in-the-middle attacks against our mobile apps and are under further review...", then he disappears under the hood to watch cartoons for about 5 minutes.

The problem is, the NFL is no different from any other corporation trying to sell its product, look at the article Kelly Jackson Higgins did last week about the Progressive dongle, and they're an insurance company, nobody cares... if something happens, just reach into the can and grap a prepared message or put someone on Roger Goodell's "double-secret-probation list" until it all blows over.

As for the Super Bowl... the Cheaters versus the Loud-mouth upstarts, no thanks my neighbors and I have have decided to have a "mini" Humphrey Bogart film festival... 1st showing, The African Queen, 2nd The Maltese Falcon and ending with Casablanca. We could start a little earlier and have Key Largo as a bonus.
Ericka Chickowski
50%
50%
Ericka Chickowski,
User Rank: Moderator
1/28/2015 | 9:11:28 AM
Re: NFL Response?
AWS0513: Please see the updated story for NFL comments. Thx!
ODA155
100%
0%
ODA155,
User Rank: Ninja
1/28/2015 | 8:32:44 PM
Re: NFL Response?
@Ericka Chickowski, "...after further review of the alleged mobile app vulnerabilty(s), we don't care and the flag has been picked up... nothing to see here folks, except the Super Bowl."

Seriously, I know you're not surprised, heck after everything that's happenedthis NFL season, I'd say their (NFL) response is very fitting.
aws0513
100%
0%
aws0513,
User Rank: Ninja
1/29/2015 | 9:07:22 AM
Re: NFL Response?
@Ericka - Thanks for the updated info.  I wish I could provide similar answers to regulatory auditors.
sonofsaf
50%
50%
sonofsaf,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/27/2015 | 6:56:01 PM
artificially generated stampedes
The biggest threat here is an undiscussable one - the notion of an "artificially generated stampede."  NFL stadiums are more suscpetible than other large, confined crowds (ballparks, motor speedways, etc.).  agsaf.org
Broadway0474
50%
50%
Broadway0474,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/29/2015 | 10:47:23 PM
Re: artificially generated stampedes
sonofsaf, a "stampede"? Did I miss something? How would that be generated? I am not poking fun ... just curious how we went from an app vulnerability to people getting crushed to death like they're at an English soccer match.
sonofsaf
50%
50%
sonofsaf,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/31/2015 | 8:25:57 AM
Re: artificially generated stampedes
Truth be told, I'm not terribly concerned about manipulation of the NFL mobile app.  I'm far more worried about Stingray technology, bulk emails/text messages, reverse 911 platforms, wireless hacks and particularly social media real-time saturation.  Give it some thought --- the threats or emergency evac orders woudl come from people you trust who were inadvertently taken in by a hoax.  The website does a far better job of explaining it.  Pretty generic really --- it's just the modern day, technological equivalent of shouting "fire" in a crowded theater.  60,000 - 90,000 active cell phones in every NFL stadium.
mtanenbaum801
50%
50%
mtanenbaum801,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/28/2015 | 10:04:00 AM
NFL Response
You've got to be kidding.  Their reponse is a joke and should be treated as such.  This is not a vulnerability because we say so and we are going to hold our breath till we turn blue if you don't believe us?  Well, ok, maybe you think your users are stupid.  But they are not.  That is still a stupid-bowl sized hole.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
1/28/2015 | 11:17:32 AM
Re: NFL Response
"We've looked into this vulnerability and it's been addressed." -- NFL spokesman.

That's reassuring. Unbelievable... 


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Concerns over supply chain vulnerabilities and attack visibility drove some significant changes in enterprise cybersecurity strategies over the past year. Dark Reading's 2021 Strategic Security Survey showed that many organizations are staying the course regarding the use of a mix of attack prevention and threat detection technologies and practices for dealing with cyber threats.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-42556
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
Rasa X before 0.42.4 allows Directory Traversal during archive extraction. In the functionality that allows a user to load a trained model archive, an attacker has arbitrary write capability within specific directories via a crafted archive file.
CVE-2021-42840
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
SuiteCRM before 7.11.19 allows remote code execution via the system settings Log File Name setting. In certain circumstances involving admin account takeover, logger_file_name can refer to an attacker-controlled PHP file under the web root, because only the all-lowercase PHP file extensions were blo...
CVE-2021-29835
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
IBM Business Automation Workflow 18.0, 19.0, 20.0, and 21.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X...
CVE-2021-41171
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
eLabFTW is an open source electronic lab notebook manager for research teams. In versions of eLabFTW before 4.1.0, it allows attackers to bypass a brute-force protection mechanism by using many different forged PHPSESSID values in HTTP Cookie header. This issue has been addressed by implementing bru...
CVE-2021-42836
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
GJSON before 1.9.3 allows a ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) attack.