Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Database Security
Authentication
Mobile
Privacy
Compliance
Careers and People
Identity & Access Management
Security Monitoring
Advanced Threats
Insider Threats
Vulnerability Management
Comments
Threat Intelligence: Sink or Swim?
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
 User Rank: Ninja
1/7/2015 | 3:32:14 PM
Forwarding of all raw Data to Event Managers
Would you recommend with the IoT that all logs from these devices get forwarded to event managers? My worry is that with emerginng technologies that these new log streams won't be able to be processed efficiently until we fully comprehend their exploits. I feel in that case logs may just become noise. Thoughts?
1eustace
50%
50%
1eustace,
 User Rank: Strategist
1/7/2015 | 8:27:26 PM
What about privacy?
I love the idea of "community-level information sharing and analysis centers" but what about privacy? Forward event managers a winter day log in Canada that includes sudden drop in energy consumption by the furnace, missing pet door activity, garage door access, a call to the vet, another garage door access, and the event managers will deduce with high probability of success that you came home to a sick dog.  You inadvertently just gave away pertinent detail in the form of metadata.  Point is metadata is data and can reveal a lot more than actual data.  When you start sharing IoT logs, where do you draw the line to privacy?  Thoughts?
1eustace
50%
50%
1eustace,
 User Rank: Strategist
1/7/2015 | 8:40:28 PM
Re: Forwarding of all raw Data to Event Managers
True, the volume of data would be enormous, but one could envision a solution involving distributed real-time processing by some, if not most of the IoT nodes which themselves happen to be computing devices.  This would be similar to statistical process controls (SPC) used in manufacturing whereby humans would only be alerted on anormalies for closer examination. Create a hierarchical distributed processing architecture among processor capable nodes and gateways you may end up not needing a supercomputer afterall.  Improve algorithms with experience and you might just stand the chance to eliminate false alarms.  It is actually a clever scheme, and probably an inevitable approach as IoT node count grows, but I worry about privacy as posted in another comment.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
 User Rank: Ninja
1/8/2015 | 9:31:34 AM
Re: Forwarding of all raw Data to Event Managers
That's makes sense. I too am interested to see how the IoT will fare in terms with privacy. Also the difference in how enterprises will handle enterprise given devices versus personal devices as the security safeguards will differ from device to device.
MichaelSentonas
50%
50%
MichaelSentonas,
 User Rank: Apprentice
1/12/2015 | 12:09:05 PM
Re: Forwarding of all raw Data to Event Managers
You bring up a really good point, most SIEM solutions today struggle as it is, so forwarding all the event information from so many additional devices will become a massive issue if you cannot correlate it quickly and an even bigger problem if you cannot remove noise.  That said, I want to know if someone unlocked a door— say in a semiconductor fabrication plant— when they were meant to be on holidays. To your point, big data can be a big problem in the security world when you are trying to find a very specific, targeted issue, but this is also when we need to move past the traditional SIEM products which are fast becoming irrelevant and adopt more analytics and contextualization.
MichaelSentonas
50%
50%
MichaelSentonas,
 User Rank: Apprentice
1/12/2015 | 4:02:01 PM
Re: What about privacy?
Protecting privacy is critical and needs to be carefully respected with any sharing. Sharing intelligence should never weaken and compromise privacy but there is meaningful information that can be provided to help identify indicators of attack and compromise. There certainly have been a lot of proof of concept hacks on consumer based IoT devices, but it's in the business where there will likely be real threats that we will see in 2015. Last year we saw an attack that used the HVAC system, this year it is plausible that we will see attacks that will exploit IoT devices in the enterprise and then move laterally once inside. We should be capturing information from these devices and using the event information to better protect ourselves.
MichaelSentonas
50%
50%
MichaelSentonas,
 User Rank: Apprentice
1/14/2015 | 8:24:51 PM
Device and industry threat intelligence

With all of the device and industry threat intelligence, I would love to tag all the information by source to make it easier to see what information is providing value.  If I am not getting any value from certain feeds then maybe stop using it, might be a nice "feature" especially to work out what you pay for in the upcoming year. 



COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 11/19/2020
New Proposed DNS Security Features Released
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  11/19/2020
How to Identify Cobalt Strike on Your Network
Zohar Buber, Security Analyst,  11/18/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-28331
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-24
Barco wePresent WiPG-1600W devices have Improper Access Control. Affected Version(s): 2.5.1.8. The Barco wePresent WiPG-1600W device has an SSH daemon included in the firmware image. By default, the SSH daemon is disabled and does not start at system boot. The system initialization scripts read a de...
CVE-2020-28928
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-24
In musl libc through 1.2.1, wcsnrtombs mishandles particular combinations of destination buffer size and source character limit, as demonstrated by an invalid write access (buffer overflow).
CVE-2020-28994
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-24
A SQL injection vulnerability was discovered in Karenderia Multiple Restaurant System, affecting versions 5.4.2 and below. The vulnerability allows for an unauthenticated attacker to perform various tasks such as modifying and leaking all contents of the database.
CVE-2020-13620
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-24
Fastweb FASTGate GPON FGA2130FWB devices through 2020-05-26 allow CSRF via the router administration web panel, leading to an attacker's ability to perform administrative actions such as modifying the configuration.
CVE-2020-13942
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-24
It is possible to inject malicious OGNL or MVEL scripts into the /context.json public endpoint. This was partially fixed in 1.5.1 but a new attack vector was found. In Apache Unomi version 1.5.2 scripts are now completely filtered from the input. It is highly recommended to upgrade to the latest ava...