Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Major Bitcoin Exchange Suspends Service, Suspecting Attack
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
1/6/2015 | 9:22:42 AM
Re: Safeguards
Well there are many potential benefits to the bitcoin. It behaves similar to a stock in that it appreciates and depreciates. But it is a volatile currency. The digital medium of the currency makes it easy to store and transport. It is non-government regulated which also has its ups and downs but its an alternative means of currency and that is what I attribute to its largest value. Not indicative of national restraints. Universal value.

But as you say @Marilyn Cohodas, with it being a completely digital nature of the bitcoin exposes it to a plethora of exploits.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
1/6/2015 | 9:09:11 AM
Re: Safeguards
Have to admit, I haven't warmed up -- or even totally understand -- the concept of Bitcoin and the potential for exploitation scares me. 
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
1/6/2015 | 8:51:04 AM
Safeguards
I know a big proponent to the bitcoin is that they are not government regulated. But there are a few inherent flaws with the digital currency, which I know from experience of owning a couple of bitcoins myself. First is that when you have a bitcoin wallet, you most likely have it stored locally. Bitcoin banks need to treat their distribution of coins more closely to regular banks.

I think the main question here is: Are bitcoin distributors safeguarding their "data" in a similar fashion as banks treat their data? This isn't to say they will still not experience a breach because it happens to banks anyway but to minimize risk it would behoove these organizations to try and implement similar security frameworks. I would say due to the previous events the answer is most likely no.


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 10/23/2020
Modern Day Insider Threat: Network Bugs That Are Stealing Your Data
David Pearson, Principal Threat Researcher,  10/21/2020
Are You One COVID-19 Test Away From a Cybersecurity Disaster?
Alan Brill, Senior Managing Director, Cyber Risk Practice, Kroll,  10/21/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-27743
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
libtac in pam_tacplus through 1.5.1 lacks a check for a failure of RAND_bytes()/RAND_pseudo_bytes(). This could lead to use of a non-random/predictable session_id.
CVE-2020-1915
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
An out-of-bounds read in the JavaScript Interpreter in Facebook Hermes prior to commit 8cb935cd3b2321c46aa6b7ed8454d95c75a7fca0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service attack or possible further memory corruption via crafted JavaScript. Note that this is only exploitable if the application usi...
CVE-2020-26878
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
Ruckus through 1.5.1.0.21 is affected by remote command injection. An authenticated user can submit a query to the API (/service/v1/createUser endpoint), injecting arbitrary commands that will be executed as root user via web.py.
CVE-2020-26879
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
Ruckus vRioT through 1.5.1.0.21 has an API backdoor that is hardcoded into validate_token.py. An unauthenticated attacker can interact with the service API by using a backdoor value as the Authorization header.
CVE-2020-15272
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
In the git-tag-annotation-action (open source GitHub Action) before version 1.0.1, an attacker can execute arbitrary (*) shell commands if they can control the value of [the `tag` input] or manage to alter the value of [the `GITHUB_REF` environment variable]. The problem has been patched in version ...