Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Internet Architecture Board Calls For Net Encryption By Default
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
11/24/2014 | 10:32:46 AM
Re: Encryption: A benefit as well as detriment
This does seem like a radical change that will pose some serious implementation  issues for many security teams. But the Gartner prediction -- if true -- that, by 2017, more than half of all cyberattacks will use some form of encryption to sneak malicious traffic by security systems -- is pretty scary.
GonzSTL
50%
50%
GonzSTL,
User Rank: Ninja
11/21/2014 | 2:35:24 PM
Re: Encryption: A benefit as well as detriment
Nothing is scarier than knowing that you do not know what data is flowing through your network. Implementation of this within an internal private network should only come after security related products have been developed that take this into account. This would probably also mean that existing products will be forklifted to make room for the new ones - a very expensive undertaking.
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
11/21/2014 | 2:06:52 PM
Re: Encryption is our friend, not so fast
Yes, @DrT. That's what this story talks about as the tradeoff. 
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
11/21/2014 | 8:11:34 AM
No win situationtre
This does seem like a damned if you do and damned if you don't situation. But given the trends outlined in the article, to do nothing seems to be the worst-case scenario..
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
11/20/2014 | 10:35:10 AM
Re: Encryption: A benefit as well as detriment
Agreed. Maybe I should have phrased "as well as a detriment" in a hesitant questionesque manner. But visiblity may be difficult because encryption methodologies seek specifically to limit the scope of unathorized visibility. As posed before, would the pervasive detection tools now be able to see through the encryption? Because as stated in the article if they cant, changes/modifications can be made without knowledge of the enterprise security initiative.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/20/2014 | 10:29:38 AM
Re: Encryption: A benefit as well as detriment
Encryption can be fast enough and minimal impact on the network and systems, the main problem is the visibility. 
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/20/2014 | 10:28:21 AM
Re: x.509 Galore
Public-private pair is the way to go. You have to have something you do not share with anyone but yourself. If more than two people know it, does not matter how many certificate we have.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/20/2014 | 10:25:40 AM
Encryption is our friend, not so fast
I would love to see encryption across the board in and out of the networks. There is one single problem: visibility. You know you encrypted everything and you do not know what is flowing in your network that would not mean you are secure. The tools that are required to monitor the network should also be encryption-aware for this to succeed.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
11/20/2014 | 8:54:49 AM
Encryption: A benefit as well as detriment
Thats terrifying that the increase of encryption throughout the stack will cause a growing blindspot within organizations. Are the pervasive scans currently being leveraged through IDS/IPS and MSSP's not able to break through the encryption to depict events efficiently today? Or is the obfuscation referenced here due to strictly human correlated data audits?
macker490
50%
50%
macker490,
User Rank: Ninja
11/20/2014 | 8:14:47 AM
x.509 Galore
Once just about everyone has an x.509 certificate ( we are close now ) -- just about everything you look at will appear to be valid.

this is a problem on the net NOW as people really don't know, from day to day what a site is suppose to look like -- nor x.509 identifications.

until people take up the practice of validatating and signing x.509 certificates the problem will remain: we don't know who to trust.

the deluge of x.509 certificates that your browser dumps on you should all be flagged MARGINAL TRUST

to get Full Trust you need to check the fingerprint on the certificate with a reliable source and then sign the certificate using your copy of PGP/Desktop or GnuPG

reliable source: I recommend your local Credit Union.   A co-operative would need to be set up.


News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-23270
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
In Gargoyle OS 1.12.0, when IPv6 is used, a routing loop can occur that generates excessive network traffic between an affected device and its upstream ISP's router. This occurs when a link prefix route points to a point-to-point link, a destination IPv6 address belongs to the prefix and is not a lo...
CVE-2021-29302
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
TP-Link TL-WR802N(US), Archer_C50v5_US v4_200 <= 2020.06 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in the httpd process in the body message. The attack vector is: The attacker can get shell of the router by sending a message through the network, which may lead to remote code execution.
CVE-2021-29357
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
The ECT Provider component in OutSystems Platform Server 10 before 10.0.1104.0 and 11 before 11.9.0 (and LifeTime management console before 11.7.0) allows SSRF for arbitrary outbound HTTP requests.
CVE-2021-3125
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
In TP-Link TL-XDR3230 < 1.0.12, TL-XDR1850 < 1.0.9, TL-XDR1860 < 1.0.14, TL-XDR3250 < 1.0.2, TL-XDR6060 Turbo < 1.1.8, TL-XDR5430 < 1.0.11, and possibly others, when IPv6 is used, a routing loop can occur that generates excessive network traffic between an affected device and its u...
CVE-2021-3128
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-12
In ASUS RT-AX3000, ZenWiFi AX (XT8), RT-AX88U, and other ASUS routers with firmware < 3.0.0.4.386.42095 or < 9.0.0.4.386.41994, when IPv6 is used, a routing loop can occur that generates excessive network traffic between an affected device and its upstream ISP's router. This occurs when a link...