Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Once More Into the Breach, Dear CISO
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
andregironda
100%
0%
andregironda,
User Rank: Strategist
11/7/2014 | 10:21:29 AM
Re: Not metrics and goals
Marilyn,

Please check out the Cyber Operations Maturity Framework. The basic model is the fusion center, originated at EUCOM -- fas dot org/irp/agency/dod/eucom/jac/

Typical SOCs are operating from a picture that emphasizes timelines and locality analysis, but without extensive exploratory or link analyses. They operate with indicators, but without indications analysis and without warning analysis (I&W) -- for example, I never see STIX that includes warning intelligence or attack indicators, only IoCs. Typical SOCs also separate the malware reversing process from the threat intelligence process too much... I mean, did you know that you can embed MAEC into STIX?

The primary issue for information security programs is lack of a formalized risk language and risk model based on costs to the business. For this, I could recommend FAIR as a starting point -- the book "Measuring and Managing Information Risk" (from the authors of FAIR) is timely.
Marilyn Cohodas
100%
0%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
11/7/2014 | 10:05:18 AM
Re: Not metrics and goals
Great point about getting the right team in place to execute a cybersecurity plan @andregironda! What does that look like in your view and how would it differ from the organizational structure in the typical SOC?
andregironda
100%
0%
andregironda,
User Rank: Strategist
11/6/2014 | 6:05:30 PM
Not metrics and goals
CISOs don't need more metrics and goals layered on their existing metrics and goals. They need a vision and a mission and they need people to execute. If a CISO earns a $670,000 yearly salary, up from $400,000 two years ago -- then they already have a seat at the board. What they need now is to hire people with similarly-structured salaries to execute their vision.

The vision is simple: create a cyber analytical model based on something like the fusion center, construct a framework similar to the Cyber Operations Maturity Framework, and build a platform that can deliver the results. Any technology piece such as SIEM, Cyber Threat Intelligence, Mobile Device Management, or NGFW needs to be balanced against the model and the framework -- and it must integrate with the analytical platform. Typically, an analytical platform consists of exploratory data analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and link analysis -- perhaps graded on a reference-class forecast or similar probability distribution. If you don't know what I just said, perhaps you should pick up the book, "Measuring and Managing Information Risk", which basically explains an approachable, analytical risk model to the uninitiated.

The average lifetime of a CISO is still 2 years, but their salaries are doubling every 2 years. The rest of us information security professionals have seen stagnant salaries for 20 years -- ever since we existed. If the CISOs won't change the game, then leaders will rise from the trenches. Lead, follow, or get out of the way!


Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11619
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-07
FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.springframework.aop.config.MethodLocatingFactoryBean (aka spring-aop).
CVE-2020-11620
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-07
FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.commons.jelly.impl.Embedded (aka commons-jelly).
CVE-2020-11509
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-07
An XSS vulnerability in the WP Lead Plus X plugin through 0.98 for WordPress allows remote attackers to upload page templates containing arbitrary JavaScript via the c37_wpl_import_template admin-post action (which will execute in an administrator's browser if the template is used to create a page).
CVE-2020-6647
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-07
An improper neutralization of input vulnerability in the dashboard of FortiADC may allow an authenticated attacker to perform a cross site scripting attack (XSS) via the name parameter.
CVE-2020-9286
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-07
An improper authorization vulnerability in FortiADC may allow a remote authenticated user with low privileges to perform certain actions such as rebooting the system.