Comments
US Military Officials, Defense Firms Targeted In 'Operation Pawn Storm'
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Robert McDougal
50%
50%
Robert McDougal,
User Rank: Ninja
10/27/2014 | 1:41:20 PM
Re: Data Nationalism
I will be honest with you, I am surprised that we haven't responded militarily yet.  China and Russia are both outright robbing us in broad daylight.  
securityaffairs
50%
50%
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Ninja
10/27/2014 | 7:02:34 AM
Re: Data Nationalism
Hi Thomas, are you referring to a proactive defense or what else?

Thanks Pierluigi
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Ninja
10/24/2014 | 6:16:18 PM
Re: Data Nationalism
Well, if hacking gets really bad, there's no reason it couldn't prompt a military response. I expect that will happen sooner or later, if only to send a message.
SgS125
50%
50%
SgS125,
User Rank: Ninja
10/24/2014 | 4:24:03 PM
Re: Data Nationalism
It is time for us to limit the access these criminals have to our "free" resources.  Why do we allow anyone from the former Russian empire any access to our Internet resources?  They all seem to be criminals who can't be found or are protected by their Governments.  I suspect we like to have an open Internet because our "whitehat" boys in DHS like to hack back and get what they can as well.  From my perspective I say lets just shut off the pipe and control the access.  What value do the web resources of the "unfree" world offer us in America anyway?

 

Sure they can buy a server here and have at it, but once discovered we can at least shut it down.  Maybe we could even find them easier?

 
lancop
50%
50%
lancop,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/24/2014 | 1:33:06 PM
The internet has become such a threat platform that one wonders...
The problem with the "Information Economy" is that stealing information has become trivial for those with the resources to do it professionally, and the real economy, the capability to use what was once proprietary information to manufacture real things, has been outsourced to emerging market countries by the Wall Street Consensus. That means that emerging market countries, like China, are increasingly poised to become the new epicenter of the Global Supply Chain and older industrial countries are becoming less & less relevant to a globalized 21st century economy except as consumers. Add to this the beefing up of military capabilities and the increasing confidence in using newly acquired weapons technologies in projecting national political power, and you have a guaranteed recipe for international conflicts in both the geo-political & economic spheres over the decades ahead. Yes, it is time to re-think how we connect critical IT infrastructure to a globalized, increasingly insecure internet infrastructure that is disempowering our own society by making it trivially easy for our competitors & adversaries alike to simply steal our intellectual property, undermine our militiary security and leech off of our economic prosperity. It often appears that we are suffering from "too much connectivity" and all this connectivity is not actually improving our way of life, but simply distracting us from those things that are really important. We're increasingly vulnerable because of feature creep that opens up more & more of our life to remote hacking, while merely delivering the appearance of "cool" innovations that marketers love as selling points but security personnel realize are actually new security holes big enough to drive a truck bomb thru. More & more I see the Information Economy as resembling the Subprime Mortgage Bond Market: just another misbegotten child of the Wolves of Wall Street - always looking for something to hype, sell and walk quickly away from when it turns out to be just smoke & mirrors. But it is likely that we have way too much momentum behind this Information Economy B.S., so I expect that we will crash into the economic slowdown ahead while text messaging.
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
10/24/2014 | 10:47:24 AM
Re: Data Nationalism
You raise a debate that has been raging in other nations, @Chrisitan Bryant. Your thoughts on this are provocative, for sure. I'd love to hear what other readers think about this. Let's debate!
No SOPA
50%
50%
No SOPA,
User Rank: Ninja
10/24/2014 | 3:28:49 AM
Data Nationalism
You might be surprised to hear me talk about a solution to issues like this from a perspective of data nationalism, being a GNU software user and Free Software Foundation supporter.  However, I am also about solutions to problems, and advanced forms of data nationalism are a direct approach to ending these types of network attacks and remote data breeches that cross continents.

The "world wide" web as we know it has reached its end, anyway.  It's time, as security analysts, to put on the tinfoil hats and take a few doses of paranoia.  First, access to the Internet is a service already, so start treating it more like one.  Federate the Internet (US, China, Canada, Brazil, etc.) and write interfaces between each unique instance of Internet ecosystems that cost money to access; expensive access, at that.

Once global networks and Internet providers are fractured and new standards and protocols are put in place to keep everyone with once open access out, hacking threats from other countries will initially be zero.  Of course, over time, the same hackers we worried about before will figure out ways to get in; however, now the pipe will be a single entry point and a small one, at that.  We can more easily monitor and prevent intrusion from non-USA would-be hackers.

Companies like Google and Facebook - who federated Internet supporters initially worried would never support such initiatives - could actually stand to benefit greatly from such changes, being able to demand high costs of countries like China and the EU whose users will want access to American Facebook and G+ users.  

It's another one of those tough decisions and unpopular ideas that holds incredible opportunity for control and security overall for American Internet-based companies and Government agencies and resources, but whose implementation just plain scares too many people.  It may be time to get over the fear.


White House Cybersecurity Strategy at a Crossroads
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  7/17/2018
The Fundamental Flaw in Security Awareness Programs
Ira Winkler, CISSP, President, Secure Mentem,  7/19/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-14492
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-21
Tenda AC7 through V15.03.06.44_CN, AC9 through V15.03.05.19(6318)_CN, and AC10 through V15.03.06.23_CN devices have a Stack-based Buffer Overflow via a long limitSpeed or limitSpeedup parameter to an unspecified /goform URI.
CVE-2018-3770
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
A path traversal exists in markdown-pdf version <9.0.0 that allows a user to insert a malicious html code that can result in reading the local files.
CVE-2018-3771
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
An XSS in statics-server <= 0.0.9 can be used via injected iframe in the filename when statics-server displays directory index in the browser.
CVE-2018-5065
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have a Use-after-free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user.
CVE-2018-5066
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have an Out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.