Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
So You Think You Know Risk Management
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
W. JohnF531
W. JohnF531,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/10/2016 | 3:08:15 PM
Risk Management at the Business Driver Level
The one thing that I picked up from this video and concur with is, that many security professionals, especially those that are technology focused; do not equate threats with business drivers. They equate threats with threat actors meaning a particular threat that exists "somewhere out there". When we ask ourselves what are the threats to my business drivers (how I do business, etc), we start identifying what our true risks are. We can then mitigate those risks to an appropriate level corresponding to the organization's particular risk tolerance.  This does two things for us: it allows us to cost effectively apply security controls and secondly, prevents us from throwing security controls haphazardly at a perceived threat.
pentareddy
pentareddy,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/25/2015 | 2:30:05 AM
Re: Pending Review
good video
rajkapoor25
rajkapoor25,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/8/2015 | 6:33:14 AM
Re: Pending Review
what is this comment nitin
nithin reddy04
nithin reddy04,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/9/2015 | 5:50:34 AM
Re: Pending Review
This to me is the key point of what John said: that we need to think risk first, and security second. It makes sense, but it's definitely a shift in mindset
sachin22
sachin22,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/9/2015 | 3:05:01 AM
Re: Pending Review
This to me is the key point of what John said: that we need to think risk first, and security second. It makes sense, but it's definitely a shift in mindset. 
suriya03
suriya03,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/8/2015 | 8:55:06 AM
Re: Pending Review
How are we still having this debate. Some basics....First deal with what you know, e.g. new threats appear every day, what risk do those threats pose to the organisation, how are we dealing with those threats. Second, do we understand whats truly business critical, what are the threats/risks and how are we dealing with those. Third, do we have ownership, because without it you dont have responsibility or accountability, so not even at first base. Fourth, who's tying all these strands together. Fifth, is all this being reported. 
ravi201
ravi201,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/8/2015 | 7:04:54 AM
Re: risk management
This to me is the key point of what John said: that we need to think risk first, and security second.
raijakson
raijakson,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/7/2015 | 12:54:11 PM
Re: risk management
interesting video
upender15
upender15,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/6/2015 | 8:55:49 AM
Re: risk management
nice information
jitender789
jitender789,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/6/2015 | 3:28:24 AM
Re: risk management
nice post
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Creating an Effective Incident Response Plan
Security teams are realizing their organizations will experience a cyber incident at some point. An effective incident response plan that takes into account their specific requirements and has been tested is critical. This issue of Tech Insights also includes: -a look at the newly signed cyber-incident law, -how organizations can apply behavioral psychology to incident response, -and an overview of the Open Cybersecurity Schema Framework.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-43705
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-27
In Botan before 2.19.3, it is possible to forge OCSP responses due to a certificate verification error. This issue was introduced in Botan 1.11.34 (November 2016).
CVE-2022-45934
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-27
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 6.0.10. l2cap_config_req in net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c has an integer wraparound via L2CAP_CONF_REQ packets.
CVE-2022-45931
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-27
A SQL injection issue was discovered in AAA in OpenDaylight (ODL) before 0.16.5. The aaa-idm-store-h2/src/main/java/org/opendaylight/aaa/datastore/h2/UserStore.java deleteUser function is affected when the API interface /auth/v1/users/ is used.
CVE-2022-45932
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-27
A SQL injection issue was discovered in AAA in OpenDaylight (ODL) before 0.16.5. The aaa-idm-store-h2/src/main/java/org/opendaylight/aaa/datastore/h2/RoleStore.java deleteRole function is affected when the API interface /auth/v1/roles/ is used.
CVE-2022-45933
PUBLISHED: 2022-11-27
KubeView through 0.1.31 allows attackers to obtain control of a Kubernetes cluster because api/scrape/kube-system does not require authentication, and retrieves certificate files that can be used for authentication as kube-admin. NOTE: the vendor's position is that KubeView was a "fun side proj...