Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
So You Think You Know Risk Management
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
W. JohnF531
W. JohnF531,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/10/2016 | 3:08:15 PM
Risk Management at the Business Driver Level
The one thing that I picked up from this video and concur with is, that many security professionals, especially those that are technology focused; do not equate threats with business drivers. They equate threats with threat actors meaning a particular threat that exists "somewhere out there". When we ask ourselves what are the threats to my business drivers (how I do business, etc), we start identifying what our true risks are. We can then mitigate those risks to an appropriate level corresponding to the organization's particular risk tolerance.  This does two things for us: it allows us to cost effectively apply security controls and secondly, prevents us from throwing security controls haphazardly at a perceived threat.
pentareddy
pentareddy,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/25/2015 | 2:30:05 AM
Re: Pending Review
good video
rajkapoor25
rajkapoor25,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/8/2015 | 6:33:14 AM
Re: Pending Review
what is this comment nitin
nithin reddy04
nithin reddy04,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/9/2015 | 5:50:34 AM
Re: Pending Review
This to me is the key point of what John said: that we need to think risk first, and security second. It makes sense, but it's definitely a shift in mindset
sachin22
sachin22,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/9/2015 | 3:05:01 AM
Re: Pending Review
This to me is the key point of what John said: that we need to think risk first, and security second. It makes sense, but it's definitely a shift in mindset. 
suriya03
suriya03,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/8/2015 | 8:55:06 AM
Re: Pending Review
How are we still having this debate. Some basics....First deal with what you know, e.g. new threats appear every day, what risk do those threats pose to the organisation, how are we dealing with those threats. Second, do we understand whats truly business critical, what are the threats/risks and how are we dealing with those. Third, do we have ownership, because without it you dont have responsibility or accountability, so not even at first base. Fourth, who's tying all these strands together. Fifth, is all this being reported. 
ravi201
ravi201,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/8/2015 | 7:04:54 AM
Re: risk management
This to me is the key point of what John said: that we need to think risk first, and security second.
raijakson
raijakson,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/7/2015 | 12:54:11 PM
Re: risk management
interesting video
upender15
upender15,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/6/2015 | 8:55:49 AM
Re: risk management
nice information
jitender789
jitender789,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/6/2015 | 3:28:24 AM
Re: risk management
nice post
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Incorporating a Prevention Mindset into Threat Detection and Response
Threat detection and response systems, by definition, are reactive because they have to wait for damage to be done before finding the attack. With a prevention-mindset, security teams can proactively anticipate the attacker's next move, rather than reacting to specific threats or trying to detect the latest techniques in real-time. The report covers areas enterprises should focus on: What positive response looks like. Improving security hygiene. Combining preventive actions with red team efforts.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-22309
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-24
The POWER systems FSP is vulnerable to unauthenticated logins through the serial port/TTY interface. This vulnerability can be more critical if the serial port is connected to a serial-over-lan device. IBM X-Force ID: 217095.
CVE-2022-22495
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-24
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 226941.
CVE-2020-4926
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-24
A vulnerability in the Spectrum Scale 5.1 core component and IBM Elastic Storage System 6.1 could allow unauthorized access to user data or injection of arbitrary data in the communication protocol. IBM X-Force ID: 191600.
CVE-2013-10002
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-24
A vulnerability was found in Telecommunication Software SAMwin Contact Center Suite 5.1. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function getCurrentDBVersion in the library SAMwinLIBVB.dll of the credential handler. Authentication is possible with hard-coded credentials. Upgradi...
CVE-2013-10003
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-24
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Telecommunication Software SAMwin Contact Center Suite 5.1. This affects the function getCurrentDBVersion in the library SAMwinLIBVB.dll of the database handler. The manipulation leads to sql injection. The exploit has been disclosed to the pu...