Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Russian Hackers Made $2.5B Over The Last 12 Months
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
AnonymousMan
50%
50%
AnonymousMan,
User Rank: Moderator
10/15/2014 | 7:36:47 PM
2.5 billion?
"Rescator made roughly $1 million by selling over 150,000 cards to SWIPED, one of the largest online trading platforms; SWIPED itself made $6 million in one year."

http://krebsonsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/SWIPED-report-KREBSONSEC-1.pdf

I see in the report where SWIPED made $6 million SINCE 2011....but not in one year.  Do you have a different report and if so, can you provide the link?

Also according to Krebs, who references the same report, only 109,094 of the Target cards provided by Rescator were actually "good".  That's about 2%. 

How do we get from 109k cards out of 5m being "usable" to 2.5B being made?  Again, is there a more complete report that provides these details?
AnonymousMan
50%
50%
AnonymousMan,
User Rank: Moderator
10/15/2014 | 7:37:01 PM
2.5 billion?
"Rescator made roughly $1 million by selling over 150,000 cards to SWIPED, one of the largest online trading platforms; SWIPED itself made $6 million in one year."

http://krebsonsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/SWIPED-report-KREBSONSEC-1.pdf

I see in the report where SWIPED made $6 million SINCE 2011....but not in one year.  Do you have a different report and if so, can you provide the link?

Also according to Krebs, who references the same report, only 109,094 of the Target cards provided by Rescator were actually "good".  That's about 2%. 

How do we get from 109k cards out of 5m being "usable" to 2.5B being made?  Again, is there a more complete report that provides these details?
Broadway0474
50%
50%
Broadway0474,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/15/2014 | 10:15:12 PM
Re: 2.5 billion?
@AnonymousMan, you seem to have read through the report pretty thoroughly. Does it go into details of how the authors collected their information ... more specifically, their sources? I would think some of this information would be classified by intel services, or dangerous to come by, a la investigating the arms industry.
Whoopty
50%
50%
Whoopty,
User Rank: Ninja
10/16/2014 | 8:11:13 AM
That's a lot
$2.5 billion is starting to get to the point where you wonder if the state might be getting involved. We've already seen some of the most rogue hacking elements in China come from practically autonomous military units. Perhaps the Russian government is padding its coffers with a bit of illicit hacking? 
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
10/16/2014 | 9:17:40 AM
Enforcement irony?
Isn't it ironic that in POS attacks "no one has been prosecuted so far..... therefore there is no reason for a decline, only growth." But the biggest successes (reduction of theft from legal entities) were where there were effective investigations. Isn't that kind of obvious? Or am I missing something? 
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
10/16/2014 | 9:40:11 AM
Re: Enforcement irony?
You bring up a good point Marilyn. How come there have been no substantial repercussions for these attacks? Basically illuminating the idea that if the stove never burned you, you would keep touching it proverb. Especially if it had a high yield like credit data theft.

From my perspective I would have to think it would be difficult to prosecute on an international level. Not being too familiar with other countries cyber crime laws and punishments. But in certain countries these may not apply. Is there a global authoritative level for issues such as these?
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/16/2014 | 6:37:54 PM
Re: Enforcement irony?
Laws are geographically bounded but the Internet is not, this certainly creates some challenges but if each country does its own duty property the problem would be less severe.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
10/17/2014 | 8:43:09 AM
Re: Enforcement irony?
Well there is Interpol, of course, which recently announced that it is teaming up with Kaspersky Labs and Trend Micro in a state-of-the art facility to fight cyber crime based in Singapore. But in terms of big busts stemming from the major retail breaches of the past year, the criminals responsible seem to have gotten off scott free -- at least so far.

 

 
AnonymousMan
50%
50%
AnonymousMan,
User Rank: Moderator
10/16/2014 | 10:48:38 AM
Re: That's a lot
It is a lot, but since it's pretty much a made up number AFAICT...why not say $2.5T?  Then we could really get some popular support in the US for the Govt to intervene like we all know they want to.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/16/2014 | 6:35:08 PM
Re: That's a lot
Numbers are more likely estimates but that does not change the fact that there is a market on stolen credit cards. We need to change overall system to avoid utilization of current credit cards and numbers.
prospecttoreza
50%
50%
prospecttoreza,
User Rank: Strategist
10/16/2014 | 9:31:51 AM
this number was not reported on the tax return, so were does it come from?
So Target lost around 50M cards, Home deport another 50M. Let's double this number to cover other breaches. 200M. Now, kids, let's multiply 200M by $10 per card - and we are getting a wooping $2Billion. But that is assuming that all of them are sold - at that specific price! Look at all other numbers here depicting profit from selling data to spammers and so on. These numbers have 3 meaningful digits which implies 0.1% accuracy! This is all bogus numbers that come from a mere action of multiplication.
Dr.T
0%
100%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/16/2014 | 6:32:44 PM
Time for Apple Pay?
Maybe it is time for ApplePay now. Apple releasing iOS8.1 on Monday which will support ApplePay, that may a way out with this complexity.
AnonymousMan
100%
0%
AnonymousMan,
User Rank: Moderator
10/16/2014 | 6:47:48 PM
Re: Time for Apple Pay?
LOL.


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/14/2020
Omdia Research Launches Page on Dark Reading
Tim Wilson, Editor in Chief, Dark Reading 7/9/2020
Russian Cyber Gang 'Cosmic Lynx' Focuses on Email Fraud
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/7/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-6287
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
SAP NetWeaver AS JAVA (LM Configuration Wizard), versions - 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, does not perform an authentication check which allows an attacker without prior authentication to execute configuration tasks to perform critical actions against the SAP Java system, including the ability to create a...
CVE-2020-6289
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.1, had insufficient protection against Cross-Site Request Forgery, which could be used to trick user in to browsing malicious site.
CVE-2020-6290
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.1, is vulnerable to Session Fixation attacks wherein the attacker tricks the user into using a specific session ID.
CVE-2020-6291
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.1, session mechanism does not have expiration data set therefore allows unlimited access after authenticating once, leading to Insufficient Session Expiration
CVE-2020-6292
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
Logout mechanism in SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.1, does not invalidate one of the session cookies, leading to Insufficient Session Expiration.