Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Russian Hackers Made $2.5B Over The Last 12 Months
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
AnonymousMan
50%
50%
AnonymousMan,
User Rank: Moderator
10/15/2014 | 7:36:47 PM
2.5 billion?
"Rescator made roughly $1 million by selling over 150,000 cards to SWIPED, one of the largest online trading platforms; SWIPED itself made $6 million in one year."

http://krebsonsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/SWIPED-report-KREBSONSEC-1.pdf

I see in the report where SWIPED made $6 million SINCE 2011....but not in one year.  Do you have a different report and if so, can you provide the link?

Also according to Krebs, who references the same report, only 109,094 of the Target cards provided by Rescator were actually "good".  That's about 2%. 

How do we get from 109k cards out of 5m being "usable" to 2.5B being made?  Again, is there a more complete report that provides these details?
AnonymousMan
50%
50%
AnonymousMan,
User Rank: Moderator
10/15/2014 | 7:37:01 PM
2.5 billion?
"Rescator made roughly $1 million by selling over 150,000 cards to SWIPED, one of the largest online trading platforms; SWIPED itself made $6 million in one year."

http://krebsonsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/SWIPED-report-KREBSONSEC-1.pdf

I see in the report where SWIPED made $6 million SINCE 2011....but not in one year.  Do you have a different report and if so, can you provide the link?

Also according to Krebs, who references the same report, only 109,094 of the Target cards provided by Rescator were actually "good".  That's about 2%. 

How do we get from 109k cards out of 5m being "usable" to 2.5B being made?  Again, is there a more complete report that provides these details?
Broadway0474
50%
50%
Broadway0474,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/15/2014 | 10:15:12 PM
Re: 2.5 billion?
@AnonymousMan, you seem to have read through the report pretty thoroughly. Does it go into details of how the authors collected their information ... more specifically, their sources? I would think some of this information would be classified by intel services, or dangerous to come by, a la investigating the arms industry.
Whoopty
50%
50%
Whoopty,
User Rank: Ninja
10/16/2014 | 8:11:13 AM
That's a lot
$2.5 billion is starting to get to the point where you wonder if the state might be getting involved. We've already seen some of the most rogue hacking elements in China come from practically autonomous military units. Perhaps the Russian government is padding its coffers with a bit of illicit hacking? 
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
10/16/2014 | 9:17:40 AM
Enforcement irony?
Isn't it ironic that in POS attacks "no one has been prosecuted so far..... therefore there is no reason for a decline, only growth." But the biggest successes (reduction of theft from legal entities) were where there were effective investigations. Isn't that kind of obvious? Or am I missing something? 
prospecttoreza
50%
50%
prospecttoreza,
User Rank: Strategist
10/16/2014 | 9:31:51 AM
this number was not reported on the tax return, so were does it come from?
So Target lost around 50M cards, Home deport another 50M. Let's double this number to cover other breaches. 200M. Now, kids, let's multiply 200M by $10 per card - and we are getting a wooping $2Billion. But that is assuming that all of them are sold - at that specific price! Look at all other numbers here depicting profit from selling data to spammers and so on. These numbers have 3 meaningful digits which implies 0.1% accuracy! This is all bogus numbers that come from a mere action of multiplication.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
10/16/2014 | 9:40:11 AM
Re: Enforcement irony?
You bring up a good point Marilyn. How come there have been no substantial repercussions for these attacks? Basically illuminating the idea that if the stove never burned you, you would keep touching it proverb. Especially if it had a high yield like credit data theft.

From my perspective I would have to think it would be difficult to prosecute on an international level. Not being too familiar with other countries cyber crime laws and punishments. But in certain countries these may not apply. Is there a global authoritative level for issues such as these?
AnonymousMan
50%
50%
AnonymousMan,
User Rank: Moderator
10/16/2014 | 10:48:38 AM
Re: That's a lot
It is a lot, but since it's pretty much a made up number AFAICT...why not say $2.5T?  Then we could really get some popular support in the US for the Govt to intervene like we all know they want to.
Dr.T
0%
100%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/16/2014 | 6:32:44 PM
Time for Apple Pay?
Maybe it is time for ApplePay now. Apple releasing iOS8.1 on Monday which will support ApplePay, that may a way out with this complexity.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/16/2014 | 6:35:08 PM
Re: That's a lot
Numbers are more likely estimates but that does not change the fact that there is a market on stolen credit cards. We need to change overall system to avoid utilization of current credit cards and numbers.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Overcoming the Challenge of Shorter Certificate Lifespans
Mike Cooper, Founder & CEO of Revocent,  10/15/2020
7 Tips for Choosing Security Metrics That Matter
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  10/19/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-25820
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
BigBlueButton before 2.2.7 allows remote authenticated users to read local files and conduct SSRF attacks via an uploaded Office document that has a crafted URL in an ODF xlink field.
CVE-2020-26895
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
Prior to 0.10.0-beta, LND (Lightning Network Daemon) would have accepted a counterparty high-S signature and broadcast tx-relay invalid local commitment/HTLC transactions. This can be exploited by any peer with an open channel regardless of the victim situation (e.g., routing node, payment-receiver,...
CVE-2020-26896
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
Prior to 0.11.0-beta, LND (Lightning Network Daemon) had a vulnerability in its invoice database. While claiming on-chain a received HTLC output, it didn't verify that the corresponding outgoing off-chain HTLC was already settled before releasing the preimage. In the case of a hash-and-amount collis...
CVE-2020-5790
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-20
Cross-site request forgery in Nagios XI 5.7.3 allows a remote attacker to perform sensitive application actions by tricking legitimate users into clicking a crafted link.
CVE-2020-5791
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-20
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command in Nagios XI 5.7.3 allows a remote, authenticated admin user to execute operating system commands with the privileges of the apache user.