Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Poll: Employees Clueless About Social Engineering
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
GonzSTL
50%
50%
GonzSTL,
User Rank: Ninja
10/2/2014 | 6:11:21 PM
Employees Clueless About Social Engineering
This comes as no surprise, although I balk at using the word "clueless". Breaches are becoming more common these days and the news coverage is really wide. Since many of these breaches are due to social engineering, people do have a general idea about the subject. The important thing is that social engineering has evolved quite a bit over the years to become more sophisticated. Add to that the popularity of social media, and all of a sudden there is a plethora of new threat vectors that the bad guys can exploit. Any security awareness training should inform users of these new vectors and present ways of changing their behavior to adopt more secure computing practices in light of the new vectors. One thing is certain - the weakest link in the information security chain is the human being, and the best way to reinforce that weakness is through relevant and effective awareness training. You can throw as many technical controls at an infrastructure, but if the weakest link is exploited successfully, then the controls may be rendered ineffective.
SecOpsSpecialist
50%
50%
SecOpsSpecialist,
User Rank: Moderator
10/3/2014 | 3:41:39 PM
Re: Employees Clueless About Social Engineering
@Gonz - So I have a few things about your response that as a Security Awareness Trainer, I see problems with.

 1. It's not really called news anymore, it's media. These "news" stations are not reporting on news, but they are creating sensational stories that people enjoy watching. The last time any station like Fox, NBC, CNBC, or MSN had anything news worthy was before Clinton was in office. Now, it's journalists turned sensationalists and it is not really news. Prime example, the Ebola issue. The "media" is saying it's airborne, but science has proved otherwise. What's the result? People freaking out because they are misinformed.

2. You say that "Any security awareness training should inform users of these new vectors and present ways of changing their behavior" that's the biggest problem right there. Inform them yes, but assuming it will change their behavior? No. Many organizations go into training thinking that by providing training they can change the behavior of the end user. It doesn't work that way. No amount of training is going to change a person's behavior. What fixes behavior is punishment and reprimands. Threaten to, or fire someone who isn't following Security policy? That gets the word out and people then will start to comply. Fear is a bigger motivator than anything. If people suspect their job and their livelihood is on the line if they don't follow Security policy and learn from the Security Awareness Training, they are going to be more likely to follow the policies and be more vigilant in their surfing.

3. You say that relevant and effective Security awareness training is what the organization needs. But what does that mean exactly? If the training is blanket, like most Security programs are, that's not relevant, just simply meeting standards to meet compliance. To be "effective" as you put it, the training must be targeted to the group. It cannot be simply "oh well here's the HIPAA compliance, follow it" or "oh here's the PCI compliance stuff, follow it." People have the innate "what's in it for me?" or "why does this apply to me?" If a trainer can combine that with information as a delivery mechanism, it will stick with a person much longer than if it were just a simple blanket solution.

 

@Marilyn - I think this is a fantastic article and I agree that lack of employee awareness is a big contributing factor. But, at the same time, even if an employee is informed, it is really their choice if they want to follow Security policy or not and keep the organization safe.
aws0513
50%
50%
aws0513,
User Rank: Ninja
10/7/2014 | 2:45:39 PM
I would curious on the awareness aspect.
IMHO, it isn't that there aren't employee training programs.  Every large organization I have worked with had an IA awareness program of some kind to include annual refesher training.

The bigger problem in my opinion is the "that happens to other people" factor.  Many users still consider security as some form of "big brother" control that is nothing more than and expression of FUD.
More often than not, the incidents I have to remediate are caused by people who took all the training, but felt that they were immune to attacks for various reasons to include people who believe the following statements:
  • "I'm smarter than most users.  I know what is safe and what is not."
  • "What do you mean I should not be shopping while I am at work?"
  • "Security is your problem, not mine."
  • "Your security systems allowed me to go to the site, so this is all your fault."
  • "I think your AV system sucks!"

I'm sure other people can come up with classic responses that represent similar user apathy that I encounter regularly.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
10/7/2014 | 2:54:15 PM
Re: I would curious on the awareness aspect.
I think you are on to something @aws0513. And its not just the typical user who thinks it can't happen to him or her. As Chris Hadnagy pointed out in the Dark Reading radio show (How to Hack a Human),  the garden variety phishing emails are getting so slick these days that even a seasoned security pro could fall victim, especially considering the heavy volume of emails we all get every every hour of every day.
aws0513
50%
50%
aws0513,
User Rank: Ninja
10/7/2014 | 3:08:43 PM
Re: I would curious on the awareness aspect.
Certainly, there are some very convincing social engineering activities out there.
But being hacked when conducting good security practices is far different than not practicing good security practices at all...  especially if awareness has been established.
I constantly see many users who just do not feel that any effort is necessary or worthy.  Some are just in denial, others play the blame game, others are defeatists, yet others are resistant to anything that resembles a control no matter the intent.


Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19551
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
In userman 13.0.76.43 through 15.0.20 in Sangoma FreePBX, XSS exists in the User Management screen of the Administrator web site. An attacker with access to the User Control Panel application can submit malicious values in some of the time/date formatting and time-zone fields. These fields are not b...
CVE-2019-19552
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
In userman 13.0.76.43 through 15.0.20 in Sangoma FreePBX, XSS exists in the user management screen of the Administrator web site, i.e., the/admin/config.php?display=userman URI. An attacker with sufficient privileges can edit the Display Name of a user and embed malicious XSS code. When another user...
CVE-2019-19620
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
In SecureWorks Red Cloak Windows Agent before 2.0.7.9, a local user can bypass the generation of telemetry alerts by removing NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM permissions from a malicious file.
CVE-2019-19625
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
SROS 2 0.8.1 (which provides the tools that generate and distribute keys for Robot Operating System 2 and uses the underlying security plugins of DDS from ROS 2) leaks node information due to a leaky default configuration as indicated in the policy/defaults/dds/governance.xml document.
CVE-2019-19627
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
SROS 2 0.8.1 (after CVE-2019-19625 is mitigated) leaks ROS 2 node-related information regardless of the rtps_protection_kind configuration. (SROS2 provides the tools to generate and distribute keys for Robot Operating System 2 and uses the underlying security plugins of DDS from ROS 2.)