Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Poll: Significant Insecurity About Internet of Things
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Some Guy
Some Guy,
User Rank: Moderator
9/11/2014 | 3:06:12 PM
Biggest Risk is to First Responders
Governments are more worried about the risks of loss of personally identifiable information than they are for the continuity of systems that support first responders.

That's just wrong. In the former instance, they are going to get sued, in the later, the very fabric of society is at risk (e.g., the Superdome after Katrina). So dispatch centers, comms & command and control systems, fire/police/ambulance in-vehicle systems, and emergency-rooms are the targets that I worry about first.
Marilyn Cohodas
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
9/8/2014 | 9:21:41 AM
Re: Biggest risk? No standards!
Standards are definitely a big issue, @Stratustician, not the least of which is getting the manufacturing industry to heed the advice of the security industry. Don A. Bailey from Lab Mouse Security recently blogged for us about his efforts to develop security frameworks for the IoT (See http://www.darkreading.com/vulnerabilities---threats/all-in-for-the-coming-world-of-things/a/d-id/1298209?page_number=2)And he's looking for reviewers.

One particularly tough frameworks issue is the Goldilocks problem of developing a set of standards that is not overly broad or overly narrow. Don wrote: 

Since everyone was essentially using the same model across all verticals to design and deploy Internet of Things technology, a framework became almost too simple. But, there are a lot of unexpected issues with IoT security frameworks. This is not because frameworks or IoT technologies hold bizarre surprises hidden under PCB boards (although some manufactured in certain countries might). It's because the deployment environments for embedded/IoT devices bring unexpected attacks that you would not otherwise see in server or desktop environments.

Stratustician
Stratustician,
User Rank: Moderator
9/8/2014 | 9:06:15 AM
Biggest risk? No standards!
Well, the good news is that over half realize just about everything is a potential risk when it comes to IoT.  For me, the real risk comes from the fact that many of these connected devices were designed without universal standards so trying to patch security as part of an afterthought is going to reveal some real big headaches.  What we need is a security standard to be created and built into these devices to protect the transmission of information.  Until this piece is figured out, it's probably going to be a bit of an uphill climb for awhile.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Improving Enterprise Cybersecurity With XDR
Enterprises are looking at eXtended Detection and Response technologies to improve their abilities to detect, and respond to, threats. While endpoint detection and response is not new to enterprise security, organizations have to improve network visibility, expand data collection and expand threat hunting capabilites if they want their XDR deployments to succeed. This issue of Tech Insights also includes: a market overview for XDR from Omdia, questions to ask before deploying XDR, and an XDR primer.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-31017
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-25
Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. Versions 2.1.0 through and including 5.2 are vulnerable to a logic error. A stream configured as private with protected history, where new subscribers should not be allowed to see messages sent before they were subscribed, when edited causes the serve...
CVE-2022-31016
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-25
Argo CD is a declarative continuous deployment for Kubernetes. Argo CD versions v0.7.0 and later are vulnerable to an uncontrolled memory consumption bug, allowing an authorized malicious user to crash the repo-server service, resulting in a Denial of Service. The attacker must be an authenticated A...
CVE-2022-24893
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-25
ESP-IDF is the official development framework for Espressif SoCs. In Espressif’s Bluetooth Mesh SDK (`ESP-BLE-MESH`), a memory corruption vulnerability can be triggered during provisioning, because there is no check for the `SegN` field of the Transaction Start PDU. This can resul...
CVE-2022-29168
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-25
Wire is a secure messaging application. Wire is vulnerable to arbitrary HTML and Javascript execution via insufficient escaping when rendering `@mentions` in the wire-webapp. If a user receives and views a malicious message, arbitrary code is injected and executed in the context of the victim allowi...
CVE-2019-25071
PUBLISHED: 2022-06-25
** DISPUTED ** A vulnerability was found in Apple iPhone up to 12.4.1. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is Siri. Playing an audio or video file might be able to initiate Siri on the same device which makes it possible to execute commands remotely. Exploit details have...