Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
4 Hurdles To Securing The Internet Of Things
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
9/10/2014 | 6:14:15 PM
Re: Add # 5: IoT rarely reboot so miss boot checks
Good ones. Thanks for providing the examples. 
Some Guy
50%
50%
Some Guy,
User Rank: Moderator
9/6/2014 | 1:01:48 AM
Re: Add # 5: IoT rarely reboot so miss boot checks
e.g., when was the last time you rebooted your settop box? WiFi router? NEST? iPhone?
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
9/5/2014 | 4:36:16 PM
Re: Add # 5: IoT rarely reboot so miss boot checks
I hadn't thought of that one, @SomeGuy. Thanks! Any particular devices you'd use as an example here that illustrate this? 
Some Guy
100%
0%
Some Guy,
User Rank: Moderator
9/5/2014 | 4:26:43 PM
Add # 5: IoT rarely reboot so miss boot checks
To your list I'd add a 5th one. Embedded real-time systems rarely reboot, so a lot of the fundamental underpinnings of cybersecurity that are checked at boot time (e.g., measured boot) don't happen often enough (if at all). If you solve 1-4 without solving this, you are building on quicksand. Maybe it should be # 0.
Sara Peters
100%
0%
Sara Peters,
User Rank: Author
9/5/2014 | 11:41:58 AM
Re: all as bad as the rest
@Kelly  Well I suppose they have to start with taking some responsibility before any of the other challenges are overcome. I wonder if the manufacturers of IoT products will start using more off-the-shelf software. Maybe that would start to make a dent in the patch management problem. 

Sigh. We're going to be talking abnout this for a long time.
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
9/5/2014 | 11:05:03 AM
Re: all as bad as the rest
There are other issues, too, but these were the top of mind ones security experts flagged.

I think the overarching one is the taking responsibility/ownership.
Sara Peters
50%
50%
Sara Peters,
User Rank: Author
9/5/2014 | 11:00:22 AM
all as bad as the rest
Wow. I'm sitting here trying to decide which of these problems is the worst, and I can't decide because they're all dreadful. The next question I guess is which one is most likely to be overcome soonest... and I'm not sure about that either. Anyone else?


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/4/2020
Abandoned Apps May Pose Security Risk to Mobile Devices
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/29/2020
How AI and Automation Can Help Bridge the Cybersecurity Talent Gap
Peter Barker, Chief Product Officer at ForgeRock,  6/1/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13842
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). A dangerous AT command was made available even though it is unused. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200010 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13843
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS software before 2020-06-01. Local users can cause a denial of service because checking of the userdata partition is mishandled. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200014 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13839
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via a custom AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200007 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13840
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via an MTK AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200008 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13841
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 9 and 10 (MTK chipsets). An AT command handler allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200009 (June 2020).