Comments
'Energetic' Bear Under The Microscope
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
BoatnerB
50%
50%
BoatnerB,
User Rank: Author
8/1/2014 | 10:22:52 AM
Interesting piece
Interesting reading, Kelly!
securityaffairs
50%
50%
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Ninja
8/1/2014 | 9:26:33 AM
Re: state-sponsored hacking
Dear Kelly,

I suspect that they have used them, but we are not able to detect any similar intrusion due to the difficulties to track high sophisticated APT (e.g. State-sponsored malware).

Anyway, as you have remarked, it is worrying that the bad actors succeeded also exploiting poorly configured servers.

Thanks
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
8/1/2014 | 9:19:50 AM
Re: state-sponsored hacking
Appparently, they really didn't need 0days, which is sad but reality.
securityaffairs
50%
50%
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Ninja
8/1/2014 | 9:01:20 AM
Re: state-sponsored hacking
yes Kelly you are right ... comments in the code, as explained by other security firms, seems indicate that hackers have Russian origin. I believe it is very strange that no zero-day exploits were used in the campaign, I believe that there are a lot of details still uncovered.

 
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
8/1/2014 | 7:54:22 AM
Re: state-sponsored hacking
State-sponsored is definitely the assumption on this campaign. It's interesting that Kaspersky Lab is saying they can't confirm it's Russian-based. CrowdStrike and F-Secure have indicated it's out of Russia. But attribution can be tricky, as we've seen.
securityaffairs
50%
50%
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Ninja
8/1/2014 | 6:25:07 AM
state-sponsored hacking
Despite the attribution is very difficult and the bad actors behind the campaign haven't used any sophisticated strain of malware, I believe that the APT has a state-sponsored origin.

Statistics on working time, dimension of the architecture and targeted industries suggest me that we are facing with a cyber espionage campaign arranged by a government ... and probably this is just the tip of the iceberg.


'Hidden Tunnels' Help Hackers Launch Financial Services Attacks
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/20/2018
Inside a SamSam Ransomware Attack
Ajit Sancheti, CEO and Co-Founder, Preempt,  6/20/2018
Tesla Employee Steals, Sabotages Company Data
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  6/19/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-12697
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-23
A NULL pointer dereference (aka SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000000) was discovered in work_stuff_copy_to_from in cplus-dem.c in GNU libiberty, as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.30. This can occur during execution of objdump.
CVE-2018-12698
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-23
demangle_template in cplus-dem.c in GNU libiberty, as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.30, allows attackers to trigger excessive memory consumption (aka OOM) during the "Create an array for saving the template argument values" XNEWVEC call. This can occur during execution of objdump.
CVE-2018-12699
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-23
finish_stab in stabs.c in GNU Binutils 2.30 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact, as demonstrated by an out-of-bounds write of 8 bytes. This can occur during execution of objdump.
CVE-2018-12700
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-23
A Stack Exhaustion issue was discovered in debug_write_type in debug.c in GNU Binutils 2.30 because of DEBUG_KIND_INDIRECT infinite recursion.
CVE-2018-11560
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-23
The webService binary on Insteon HD IP Camera White 2864-222 devices has a stack-based Buffer Overflow leading to Control-Flow Hijacking via a crafted usr key, as demonstrated by a long remoteIp parameter to cgi-bin/CGIProxy.fcgi on port 34100.