Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Google's Privacy Invasion: It's Your Fault
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
Skitch
50%
50%
Skitch,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/18/2012 | 3:13:54 PM
re: Google's Privacy Invasion: It's Your Fault
Well said. The only thing I disagree with is the suggestion that Google would consider the Software as a Service approach. Fundamentally, capitalism would not permit it as people would just find a new search engine.

PMEIBOSCH000
50%
50%
PMEIBOSCH000,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/18/2012 | 3:15:06 PM
re: Google's Privacy Invasion: It's Your Fault
IF YOU THINK PAYING FOR A SERVER OR ANYTHING ELSE GIVES YOU PRIVACY
ON THE INERTNET:YOU ARE A FOOL ...
Stingray1964
50%
50%
Stingray1964,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/18/2012 | 3:21:37 PM
re: Google's Privacy Invasion: It's Your Fault
You are so correct !
We are the blame but people never see it that way.
But you know know what with all the faults of any of these Search engines , I do like Google the most , Chrome works fine me , I love my Google Phone and my gmail as well , Had Yahoo and Hotmail and few others , So i get an ad banner but not as much junk mail . Just maybe if people learned how to use their settings. then things would work better for them .
But as far Apple goes , I rather have the faults of a windows base computer then an apple. I like the change things and move around and not have to buy a whole computer cause Apple made on little change or Have to spend 700 for a cellphone cause I thought 8gigs was fine but now I have to buy a whole new phone cause I need more memory .
gorkable
50%
50%
gorkable,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/18/2012 | 3:48:07 PM
re: Google's Privacy Invasion: It's Your Fault
Yes, actually a fairly balanced article. Oh, you mean Apple has privacy/security "holes" too, surprise surprise...but Apple somehow will not get much negative press for not catching this- It does sound like Google did respond to the users request to keep them signed in, the question is simply if the extra cookies were accidental.
Nickolas
50%
50%
Nickolas,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/18/2012 | 4:00:00 PM
re: Google's Privacy Invasion: It's Your Fault
Great job on the well thought out article that actually decided to give both sides of the story. I've been following this story since yesterday and until now I couldn't find an article that told the whole story. The tech sphere is in a really sad state these days. Playing on privacy fears is one of the few tools they have left, though ironic since their own websites have intrusive ads that install tracking cookies on consumer's computers.
Geo Love
50%
50%
Geo Love,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/18/2012 | 4:31:27 PM
re: Google's Privacy Invasion: It's Your Fault
Nice Thomas. A lesson to learn from... for Google and for us. Having been a huge supporter of Google from the start I'm saddened to see such blatant behavior as we have been subject to. But let's be real. Should I be/am I surprised? (Politely) NO!

Being THE premier, major search engine and data collector AND free service provider, AND, AND, AND... that pervades every aspect of our lives today' it is pretty amazing that Google has been able to go this far without hitting the speed bumps any harder than it has or has been caught doing.

That said. I'd love to see Google's unofficial "Don't be evil" motto http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D... upgraded to "official" and reestablished as it's core value to it's end users. But "money is the root of all evil" and ultimately ends up trumping any well intentioned money making enterprise that may wish to aspire to such great, lofty ideals.

Can it ever be achieved? Truthfully, probably not. The balancing act of pleasing both sides of the equation is just not a realistic business objective.

Stockholders' bank accounts simply don't accept it as a form of currency; an immense pressure that can't be overridden. "Business is business" and "the bottom line" focus is what they expect and demand. That's Corporate Reality.

So... it IS up to US to protect ourselves by CLOSELY, ACTIVELY, RESPONSIBLY monitoring every move AND LEARNING/UTILIZING those available and free 3rd party tools/addons as part of our everyday personal security and privacy interactions while webbing.

My end user friends... Be Aware. Be Very Aware. Foremost and Always!

And Google... We do still love you, but YES, we are watching you.
Emeritus
50%
50%
Emeritus,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/18/2012 | 5:08:43 PM
re: Google's Privacy Invasion: It's Your Fault
What screaming nonsense. I've taught technological regulation for 35 years. The whole point of regulation is to allow workers or consumers to have the benefits of technology without being "raped" by those with power. And many concepts, like privacy or safety or patentable innovation cannot be defined in isolation. They are implemented on a case by case basis.
nomanzone
50%
50%
nomanzone,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/18/2012 | 5:25:28 PM
re: Google's Privacy Invasion: It's Your Fault
As long as the information that Google collects is non-personal, non-persistent, and only used for real time advertisements (such as the ads you see along side your gmail), Google is not only harmless, it is invaluable for the modern society. But it is in a position that it could do a lot more. The question is do you trust Google? Under the current management, I'd say yes. But it is always possible that someone like Rupert Murdoch may become the CEO of Google. When that happens, he does not need to hack into your phone or email any more. Everything is laid in the open for him.
DAGOSTA000
50%
50%
DAGOSTA000,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/18/2012 | 5:33:32 PM
re: Google's Privacy Invasion: It's Your Fault
I agree with 'what screaming nonsense.'

Put the blame on users of the internet? Of course. Every internet user knows what RFC and P3P mean in their daily lives.

You reference an article: "This is what the EFF recommends." In the footnotes of that article is this: "As this blog goes to press, we are unsure whether ad blockers for Safari can prevent the browser from sending requests, which is essential for this kind of privacy protection to be effective."

Is that the fault of "internet users?"
BCOOK6432
50%
50%
BCOOK6432,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/18/2012 | 5:57:47 PM
re: Google's Privacy Invasion: It's Your Fault
it's kind of funny how hypocritical this article is since the only way to comment on it is if I register with the website and there are currently 20 scripts running, or trying to run, in the background of the page keeping an eye on everyone who looks at it, 2 of which are Google related. I personally use NoScript to block about half of them.
Page 1 / 4   >   >>


News
FluBot Malware's Rapid Spread May Soon Hit US Phones
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/28/2021
Slideshows
7 Modern-Day Cybersecurity Realities
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  4/30/2021
Commentary
How to Secure Employees' Home Wi-Fi Networks
Bert Kashyap, CEO and Co-Founder at SecureW2,  4/28/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-20538
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-10
IBM Cloud Pak for Security (CP4S) 1.5.0.0 and 1.5.0.1 could allow a user to obtain sensitive information or perform actions they should not have access to due to incorrect authorization mechanisms. IBM X-Force ID: 198919.
CVE-2021-20559
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-10
IBM Control Desk 7.6.1.2 and 7.6.1.3 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 199228.
CVE-2021-20577
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-10
IBM Cloud Pak for Security (CP4S) 1.5.0.0 and 1.5.0.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force I...
CVE-2021-29501
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-10
Ticketer is a command based ticket system cog (plugin) for the red discord bot. A vulnerability allowing discord users to expose sensitive information has been found in the Ticketer cog. Please upgrade to version 1.0.1 as soon as possible. As a workaround users may unload the ticketer cog to disable...
CVE-2020-13529
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-10
An exploitable denial-of-service vulnerability exists in Systemd 245. A specially crafted DHCP FORCERENEW packet can cause a server running the DHCP client to be vulnerable to a DHCP ACK spoofing attack. An attacker can forge a pair of FORCERENEW and DCHP ACK packets to reconfigure the server.