Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Why A Secured Network Is Like The Human Body
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Dan Ross
Dan Ross,
User Rank: Author
7/1/2014 | 8:17:32 AM
Re: Preventive vs Proactive
well, your mileage may vary but we've seen reasons like not having the resources/means to do this effectively, talent on staff, costs to outsource ongoing testing vs audit compliance must do activities, to name a few. In general, we believe customers that can carry this out as part of a larger plan to detect potential threats proactively stand a far better chance of stopping or at least limiting their next targetted attack.
RyanSepe
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
6/30/2014 | 5:53:08 PM
Re: Preventive vs Proactive
What would you say is the reason/s why ethical hacking isn't more prevalent? Especially within organizations on there own test environments?
Dan Ross
Dan Ross,
User Rank: Author
6/30/2014 | 10:49:25 AM
Re: Apt analogy
Thank you! At the risk of changing the scope of the article, I thought it was a good place to leave it at, due care, but I agree with you that such a term does interject a legal element to the conversation. I am sure we will see more around this topic. 
Marilyn Cohodas
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
6/30/2014 | 10:01:09 AM
Re: Apt analogy
Agree that an important shift is taking place within the security industry -- though I would argue that the use of the term "due care' does interject a legal element to the discussion, particularly in light of pending litigation related to the Target breach.

But, in terms of how security pros need to respond to the changing threat landschipe, due care is as good a term as any to describe what needs to be done!

 

 
Dan Ross
Dan Ross,
User Rank: Author
6/30/2014 | 10:00:22 AM
Re: Preventive vs Proactive
I couldn't agree more with you Ryan.  More Pen Testing, not just as part of a compliance audit but as a general practice carried out by ethical hackers is and should be considered part of this wholistic approach. At the risk of stretching the analogy a little, one could draw parallels to innoculations to disease as an example of trying to break in and bring down your defenses but instead as means to build up one's defense to an attack. The process of building up immunity hinges upon some level of exposure and allowing your body to build defense.  We as an industry should be proactively applying similar principles in trying to find areas of weakness before someone that wishes to cause us harm ultimately does.
Dan Ross
Dan Ross,
User Rank: Author
6/30/2014 | 9:46:47 AM
Re: Apt analogy
While one could form a legal argument from "due care" in this context, the consensus in this article was coming from the security industry as a whole.  Its becoming generally accepted that companies/customers are always under attack and the "boogieman" is already inside. Its our job as security professionals to see this and the ramifications this has in our approaches and the paradigm shifting in tactics, putting more emphasis on proactive vs reactive, detection vs prevention, etc.
Bprince
Bprince,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2014 | 1:31:34 AM
Re: Apt analogy
Good question. When I hear phrases like "due care" I immediately think lawsuit. But the standard for that, unless it is defined by compliance regulations, is going to have to be very broad to the point it would take something egregious on the part of the business to create liability. 

BP
RyanSepe
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
6/28/2014 | 10:11:30 PM
Preventive vs Proactive
Great article. I am a big advocate of the wholistic approach as well. But as threats evolve, security professionals are on the reactive side of the equation most of the time. What I believe needs to happen is that CyberSec professionals need to be more proactive. Preventive is a good approach but it acknowledges, mostly, that there are threats that are already known that we are trying to stop. But as we have seen, and as the article alludes to, zero day attacks will not fall into this category for preventive control.

What I am alluding to, is a higher emphasis on penetration testing. I think if this was to be a larger priority, not as many zero day attacks be would banging on the door. Its hard to justify because the idea of the health system is lets prepare to keep the body healthy and if it does fall ill, lets remediate. But if we think of zero days as such with a contagion scenario we can follow similar analogies to the point that we are trying to remediate new disease before it becomes a devastating issue.
Dan Ross
Dan Ross,
User Rank: Author
6/27/2014 | 4:26:40 PM
Re: rest
If you are referring to the Rest api, we agree, having an open standard to share security information between systems is a preferred approach. If you are referring to personal snooze time the body certainly does need rest, which is a choice...
Okal sugu
Okal sugu,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/27/2014 | 11:37:43 AM
rest
I totally agree with you. I am a believer in wholistic approach in life. How can I intergrate Rest in my systems?
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Black Hat USA 2022 Attendee Report
Black Hat attendees are not sleeping well. Between concerns about attacks against cloud services, ransomware, and the growing risks to the global supply chain, these security pros have a lot to be worried about. Read our 2022 report to hear what they're concerned about now.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-36312
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
Airspan AirVelocity 1500 software version 15.18.00.2511 lacks CSRF protections in the eNodeB's web management UI. This issue may affect other AirVelocity and AirSpeed models.
CVE-2022-38216
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
An integer overflow exists in Mapbox's closed source gl-native library prior to version 10.6.1, which is bundled with multiple Mapbox products including open source libraries. The overflow is caused by large image height and width values when creating a new Image and allows for out of bounds writes,...
CVE-2022-36306
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
An authenticated attacker can enumerate and download sensitive files, including the eNodeB's web management UI's TLS private key, the web server binary, and the web server configuration file. These vulnerabilities were found in AirVelocity 1500 running software version 9.3.0.01249, were still presen...
CVE-2022-36307
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
The AirVelocity 1500 prints SNMP credentials on its physically accessible serial port during boot. This was fixed in AirVelocity 1500 software version 15.18.00.2511 and may affect other AirVelocity and AirSpeed models.
CVE-2022-36308
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
Airspan AirVelocity 1500 web management UI displays SNMP credentials in plaintext on software versions older than 15.18.00.2511, and stores SNMPv3 credentials unhashed on the filesystem, enabling anyone with web access to use these credentials to manipulate the eNodeB over SNMP. This issue may affec...