Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Why A Secured Network Is Like The Human Body
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Dan Ross
50%
50%
Dan Ross,
User Rank: Author
7/1/2014 | 8:17:32 AM
Re: Preventive vs Proactive
well, your mileage may vary but we've seen reasons like not having the resources/means to do this effectively, talent on staff, costs to outsource ongoing testing vs audit compliance must do activities, to name a few. In general, we believe customers that can carry this out as part of a larger plan to detect potential threats proactively stand a far better chance of stopping or at least limiting their next targetted attack.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
6/30/2014 | 5:53:08 PM
Re: Preventive vs Proactive
What would you say is the reason/s why ethical hacking isn't more prevalent? Especially within organizations on there own test environments?
Dan Ross
50%
50%
Dan Ross,
User Rank: Author
6/30/2014 | 10:49:25 AM
Re: Apt analogy
Thank you! At the risk of changing the scope of the article, I thought it was a good place to leave it at, due care, but I agree with you that such a term does interject a legal element to the conversation. I am sure we will see more around this topic. 
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
6/30/2014 | 10:01:09 AM
Re: Apt analogy
Agree that an important shift is taking place within the security industry -- though I would argue that the use of the term "due care' does interject a legal element to the discussion, particularly in light of pending litigation related to the Target breach.

But, in terms of how security pros need to respond to the changing threat landschipe, due care is as good a term as any to describe what needs to be done!

 

 
Dan Ross
50%
50%
Dan Ross,
User Rank: Author
6/30/2014 | 10:00:22 AM
Re: Preventive vs Proactive
I couldn't agree more with you Ryan.  More Pen Testing, not just as part of a compliance audit but as a general practice carried out by ethical hackers is and should be considered part of this wholistic approach. At the risk of stretching the analogy a little, one could draw parallels to innoculations to disease as an example of trying to break in and bring down your defenses but instead as means to build up one's defense to an attack. The process of building up immunity hinges upon some level of exposure and allowing your body to build defense.  We as an industry should be proactively applying similar principles in trying to find areas of weakness before someone that wishes to cause us harm ultimately does.
Dan Ross
50%
50%
Dan Ross,
User Rank: Author
6/30/2014 | 9:46:47 AM
Re: Apt analogy
While one could form a legal argument from "due care" in this context, the consensus in this article was coming from the security industry as a whole.  Its becoming generally accepted that companies/customers are always under attack and the "boogieman" is already inside. Its our job as security professionals to see this and the ramifications this has in our approaches and the paradigm shifting in tactics, putting more emphasis on proactive vs reactive, detection vs prevention, etc.
Bprince
50%
50%
Bprince,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2014 | 1:31:34 AM
Re: Apt analogy
Good question. When I hear phrases like "due care" I immediately think lawsuit. But the standard for that, unless it is defined by compliance regulations, is going to have to be very broad to the point it would take something egregious on the part of the business to create liability. 

BP
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
6/28/2014 | 10:11:30 PM
Preventive vs Proactive
Great article. I am a big advocate of the wholistic approach as well. But as threats evolve, security professionals are on the reactive side of the equation most of the time. What I believe needs to happen is that CyberSec professionals need to be more proactive. Preventive is a good approach but it acknowledges, mostly, that there are threats that are already known that we are trying to stop. But as we have seen, and as the article alludes to, zero day attacks will not fall into this category for preventive control.

What I am alluding to, is a higher emphasis on penetration testing. I think if this was to be a larger priority, not as many zero day attacks be would banging on the door. Its hard to justify because the idea of the health system is lets prepare to keep the body healthy and if it does fall ill, lets remediate. But if we think of zero days as such with a contagion scenario we can follow similar analogies to the point that we are trying to remediate new disease before it becomes a devastating issue.
Dan Ross
50%
50%
Dan Ross,
User Rank: Author
6/27/2014 | 4:26:40 PM
Re: rest
If you are referring to the Rest api, we agree, having an open standard to share security information between systems is a preferred approach. If you are referring to personal snooze time the body certainly does need rest, which is a choice...
Okal sugu
50%
50%
Okal sugu,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/27/2014 | 11:37:43 AM
rest
I totally agree with you. I am a believer in wholistic approach in life. How can I intergrate Rest in my systems?
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
New 'Nanodegree' Program Provides Hands-On Cybersecurity Training
Nicole Ferraro, Contributing Writer,  8/3/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15820
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.6881, the markdown parser could disclose hidden file existence.
CVE-2020-15821
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.6881, a user without permission is able to create an article draft.
CVE-2020-15823
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.8873 is vulnerable to SSRF in the Workflow component.
CVE-2020-15824
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains Kotlin before 1.4.0, there is a script-cache privilege escalation vulnerability due to kotlin-main-kts cached scripts in the system temp directory, which is shared by all users by default.
CVE-2020-15825
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2020.1, users with the Modify Group permission can elevate other users' privileges.