Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Crowdsourcing & Cyber Security: Who Do You Trust?
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2014 | 5:58:02 PM
Re: From FOSS Came Crowdsourcing
I agree with you and have alluded to many of the same principles in another article posted. A higher emphasis needs to be put on penetration testing from a party that does not have malicious intent. Many of the security safeguards today are preventative or corrective meaning that they are both to some capacity reactive.

As you say, we need to think like the "dark side" and try to uncover threats and new intrusion methodologies before users of malicious intent do. This is one of the only ways I can see us alleviating some of the potential dangers of zero days.
RetiredUser
RetiredUser,
User Rank: Ninja
6/25/2014 | 1:38:34 AM
From FOSS Came Crowdsourcing
Well, maybe crowdsourcing wasn't strictly borne from the Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) communities, but it's improved because of them, I believe. I also believe strongly in this model, and I would argue that all along, hackers have been doing this, albeit some on the cyber crime side of things. Often the "everyman" of the enterprise community needs to evolve to think more like the dark side. I wouldn't say that crowdsourcing is beating the enemy because it is a superior methodology to what the hacker and cracker communities (yes, and old ones, at that) are doing, but rather it is moving computer internet security forward because the enterprise is finally catching up with the enemy.

As systems, component applications, their source code and vulnerabilities become more "open" (apologies to Richard Stallman for using the "o" word), everyone is empowered through the ability to make improvements, fix vulnerabilities and share the burden across the community.  One of the killers of the old guard of enterprise models was that everything was closed off, and while each IT silo was on its own, crackers and hackers the world over were sharing tech, exploits and trading anecdotes, strengthening the community and making it more deadly.

About time we got on board and evolved to their level.
Marilyn Cohodas
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
6/24/2014 | 3:57:35 PM
Good overview on pluses & minuses of crowdsourcing cyber security
Nice blog, Bob. I wonder if you'd care to expand on which "hows" you mention present th greatest challenges for crowdsourcing security. They also sound quite formidable to me! 


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Developing and Testing an Effective Breach Response Plan
Whether or not a data breach is a disaster for the organization depends on the security team's response and that is based on how the team developed a breach response plan beforehand and if it was thoroughly tested. Inside this report, experts share how to: -understand the technical environment, -determine what types of incidents would trigger the plan, -know which stakeholders need to be notified and how to do so, -develop steps to contain the breach, collect evidence, and initiate recovery.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-4282
PUBLISHED: 2022-12-05
A vulnerability was found in SpringBootCMS and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Template Management. The manipulation leads to injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VD...
CVE-2022-4281
PUBLISHED: 2022-12-05
A vulnerability has been found in Facepay 1.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /face-recognition-php/facepay-master/camera.php. The manipulation of the argument userId leads to authorization bypass. The attack can be launched remotely...
CVE-2022-41807
PUBLISHED: 2022-12-05
Missing authorization vulnerability exists in Kyocera Document Solutions MFPs and printers, which may allow a network-adjacent attacker to alter the product settings without authentication by sending a specially crafted request. Affected products/versions are as follows: TASKalfa 7550ci/6550ci, TASK...
CVE-2022-41830
PUBLISHED: 2022-12-05
Stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in Kyocera Document Solutions MFPs and printers allows a remote authenticated attacker with an administrative privilege to inject arbitrary script. Affected products/versions are as follows: TASKalfa 7550ci/6550ci, TASKalfa 5550ci/4550ci/3550ci/3050ci, TASKa...
CVE-2022-42496
PUBLISHED: 2022-12-05
OS command injection vulnerability in Nako3edit, editor component of nadesiko3 (PC Version) v3.3.74 and earlier allows a remote attacker to obtain appkey of the product and execute an arbitrary OS command on the product.