Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
DNS Pioneer Founds New Security Startup
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
RetiredUser
50%
50%
RetiredUser,
User Rank: Ninja
6/23/2014 | 3:31:12 PM
Great Thinking
Kudos, Mr. Vixie. "We're looking at a day we can tear down criminal infrastructure as fast or faster than it's built." This is a great way of thinking and hopefully one we can propagate across organizations.  Creating a database from this activity will help law enforcement and others in the cyber security industry work more efficiently with access to historic criminal domain activity.  Of course, as soon as this gets underway, the "dark side" will respond, but I assume Farsight processes and technology are designed to be as malleable as the cyber criminals are... 
Marilyn Cohodas
100%
0%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
6/23/2014 | 3:54:34 PM
"Criminals came along for the rid"
Great quote: "I spent most of the 1980s and 1990s making the Internet bigger and easier to use, but unfortunately, the criminals came along for the ride," 
Kelly Jackson Higgins
100%
0%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
6/23/2014 | 4:16:45 PM
Re: Great Thinking
What's interesting here is focusing on newly created domains and trying to stop them from getting established by the bad guys so quickly. And it's cool that DNS mavens Vixie and Mockapetris are behind this venture.
Robert McDougal
50%
50%
Robert McDougal,
User Rank: Ninja
6/23/2014 | 6:57:53 PM
Re: Great Thinking
This is awesome!  I imagine Mr. Vixie is leveraging his contacts within the domain registrars to pull this off.  I'm not sure if an average startup company could have provided this service.  Maybe I am wrong but to be able to access that information so quickly I would assume he would need access to information only available to the domain registrars.
RetiredUser
50%
50%
RetiredUser,
User Rank: Ninja
6/23/2014 | 7:14:17 PM
Re: Great Thinking
@Robert McDougal

While I love the idea of Paul being an uber-lord of the Internet, I wonder how much whois information is actually available to private, non-government parties? Now, I've seen scripts that comb whois records, and for those that are private, tries matches through Google searches of like info (users with emails matching the [email protected] or [email protected] of the domain), etc. Essentially a hack to pull as much information together with what is already out there as possible toward identifying the registrar and populating a database.  Hard to imagine a private party can get much more detailed information legally, unless Mr. Vixie is tied into PRISM... :-)


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/4/2020
Abandoned Apps May Pose Security Risk to Mobile Devices
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/29/2020
How AI and Automation Can Help Bridge the Cybersecurity Talent Gap
Peter Barker, Chief Product Officer at ForgeRock,  6/1/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13842
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). A dangerous AT command was made available even though it is unused. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200010 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13843
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS software before 2020-06-01. Local users can cause a denial of service because checking of the userdata partition is mishandled. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200014 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13839
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via a custom AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200007 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13840
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via an MTK AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200008 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13841
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 9 and 10 (MTK chipsets). An AT command handler allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200009 (June 2020).