Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Outlook.com Android App Leaves Email Messages Exposed
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
MrTibbs
MrTibbs,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/21/2014 | 6:34:44 PM
Re: Default Encryption
Hey Microsoft, At least a warning during installation is warranted here!

The Outlook desktop app has better controls over its local OST datafiles than this app.

I have used Touchdown for Exchange since Android 2.x, which DOES encrypt its datastore, plus I encrypt both internal storage and SD card and disable the developer option.

-MT

 
securityaffairs
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Ninja
5/21/2014 | 3:41:08 PM
Re: Default Encryption
Randy you are right, but in this case I believe that the app itself his poor under security perspective. Microsoft statement has no sense. Guys who have designed the app have no clear idea of security requirements neither user privacy.

Since we will read reply like the one provided by MS we have no hope to user better application .... 

Please give a look to my post on the topic and read the stats I mentioned on HP Fortify study ...

http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/25103/digital-id/outlook-app-leaks-encryption.html

Thanks

Pierluigi
Randy Naramore
Randy Naramore,
User Rank: Ninja
5/21/2014 | 2:07:53 PM
Re: Default Encryption
Sad to say but the Android apps do not have the scrutiny that apple apps have. The android platform is solid but the apps need to be held to a higher level than they currently are.
securityaffairs
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Ninja
5/21/2014 | 12:21:57 PM
Re: Default Encryption
The reply provided by Microsoft is simply absurd. This is the wrong way to think security by design. Let's blame the others ... it's too easy!

 
RyanSepe
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/20/2014 | 9:59:30 PM
Default Encryption
It seems that this is a gaping security flaw considering the ease of extraction for an SD card. Majority of users as posed in the article are default set to be unencrypted, so this hole will be available for many android based users. 

Is there any detriment to defaulting settings to encrypt instead of defaulting to unecrypted from a vendor perspective? Allow the user to make the choice but make them consciously choose to become vulnerable. This way the majority of unaware users will not be unknowlingly in danger.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Promise and Reality of Cloud Security
Cloud security has been part of the cybersecurity conversation for years but has been on the sidelines for most enterprises. The shift to remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic and digital transformation projects have moved cloud infrastructure front-and-center as enterprises address the associated security risks. This report - a compilation of cutting-edge Black Hat research, in-depth Omdia analysis, and comprehensive Dark Reading reporting - explores how cloud security is rapidly evolving.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2023-0658
PUBLISHED: 2023-02-03
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Multilaser RE057 and RE170 2.1/2.2. This affects an unknown part of the file /param.file.tgz of the component Backup File Handler. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The ide...
CVE-2022-38389
PUBLISHED: 2023-02-03
IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler 9.4, 9.5, and 10.1 is vulnerable to an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 233975.
CVE-2022-22486
PUBLISHED: 2023-02-03
IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler 9.4, 9.5, and 10.1 is vulnerable to an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 226328.
CVE-2023-0634
PUBLISHED: 2023-02-02
An uncontrolled process operation was found in the newgrp command provided by the shadow-utils package. This issue could cause the execution of arbitrary code provided by a user when running the newgrp command.
CVE-2022-48114
PUBLISHED: 2023-02-02
RuoYi up to v4.7.5 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the component /tool/gen/createTable.