Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Microsoft Issues Emergency Patch for IE, Covers XP
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Marilyn Cohodas
100%
0%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
5/1/2014 | 3:37:02 PM
Surprising twist, indeed.
Glad that Microsoft did the right thing and included XP in the patch. Hope it signifies a trend...
Kelly Jackson Higgins
100%
0%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
5/1/2014 | 4:02:29 PM
Re: Surprising twist, indeed.
It was a relatively fast turnaound for a bug that Microsoft is saying was not being widely abused. And it was especially diligent of Microsoft to include XP in this patch. 
securityaffairs
50%
50%
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Ninja
5/2/2014 | 10:00:23 AM
Re: Surprising twist, indeed.
The real problem is that similar problems will reoccur frequently. Unfortunately, to date XP is still extremely prevalent in many areas, let's think of the bank and the industrial control systems, these areas are particularly critical and a massive migration to other OSs is not so easy ... paradoxically, these areas are the main targets of cyber criminals and state-sponsored hackers.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
5/2/2014 | 10:11:02 AM
Re: Surprising twist, indeed.
@securityaffairs -- You make a great point about how much the threat landscape has changed in the years since XP has been in service. It raises a really good question about how long a company like Microsoft should support end-of-life products in the area of security. Given how embedded XP still is, I would think that ongoing patching is one area that should be continued, as they are doing with the Explorer bug
Randy Naramore
50%
50%
Randy Naramore,
User Rank: Ninja
5/2/2014 | 10:16:07 AM
Re: Surprising twist, indeed.
I agree, seems as though there have been alot of emergency patches for one thing or another lately.
LucasZa
50%
50%
LucasZa,
User Rank: Moderator
5/2/2014 | 1:58:14 PM
This casts a spotlight on Windows XP
From my AccessData blog post: This 0day exploit is just a preview of what's to come. When the next patch Tuesday rolls around May 13, Windows XP users will be left defenseless as attackers release exploits to take advantage of unpatched systems. With a 26.29 percent share of the desktop PC market, Windows XP is everywhere. Attackers seeking to compromise systems en masse can hardly wait. In fact, XP is installed on more PCs than Windows 8, Windows 8.1, and Windows Vista combined. As a security professional, I'm extremely frightened of the approaching storm. The sheer number of soon to be vulnerable XP systems combined with the level of attacker activity we're faced with will likely generate unprecedented events. For those of you still using Windows XP that cannot upgrade, I recommend reading my prior blog post for advice on how to mitigate the vulnerable state you'll be left in. I'll be sure to write more blog posts on attacker activity and mitigation techniques as events unfold.
securityaffairs
50%
50%
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Ninja
5/2/2014 | 4:44:37 PM
Re: Surprising twist, indeed.
@Marilyn Cohodas First of all Thanks! Cyber security is a shared responsibility, software vendors, governments and population must be aware of the risks related to the exploitation of zero-day flaws within products that are no more supported like WinXP. Security could not be considered a cost, the real cost is the one that must be paid by the collectivity in case of incidents.

I've really appreciated the choice of Microsoft to fix the flaw also for XP.

Let me suggest the read of my recent post on the topic ...

http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/23771/hacking/windows-xp-deadline.html

In the post I proposed interesting statistics on the diffusion of XP that give us an idea on the possible impact of a vulnerability. I have also updated the graph to see the current diffusion of XP world wide ... the market share is nearly 15% ....

http://gs.statcounter.com/#desktop-os-ww-monthly-201405-201405-bar

We cannot leave 15% of machines vulnerable ... we cannot forget that the remaining 85% relies on their security because they share in many cases same networks ... they are everywhere, they surround us.
spitball
50%
50%
spitball,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/2/2014 | 6:21:24 PM
Re: Surprising twist, indeed.
It absolutely should not be a trend. XP is no longer supported and the fact that this was relaesed was extremely fortunate for the laggards who refuse to get off of XP. This didnt sneak up on anyone, these companies have had years to prepare for this, and to blame a few critical apps they just couldnt get off, is just lazy. You cannot exist for long on an unsupported OS. Next time choose software that doesnt pin you to a 13 year old OS and 9 year old browser.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Concerns over supply chain vulnerabilities and attack visibility drove some significant changes in enterprise cybersecurity strategies over the past year. Dark Reading's 2021 Strategic Security Survey showed that many organizations are staying the course regarding the use of a mix of attack prevention and threat detection technologies and practices for dealing with cyber threats.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-3454
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-19
Truncated L2CAP K-frame causes assertion failure. Zephyr versions >= 2.4.0, >= v.2.50 contain Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency (CWE-130), Reachable Assertion (CWE-617). For more information, see https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-fx88-6c29-...
CVE-2021-3455
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-19
Disconnecting L2CAP channel right after invalid ATT request leads freeze. Zephyr versions >= 2.4.0, >= 2.5.0 contain Use After Free (CWE-416). For more information, see https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-7g38-3x9v-v7vp
CVE-2021-41150
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-19
Tough provides a set of Rust libraries and tools for using and generating the update framework (TUF) repositories. The tough library, prior to 0.12.0, does not properly sanitize delegated role names when caching a repository, or when loading a repository from the filesystem. When the repository is c...
CVE-2021-31378
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-19
In broadband environments, including but not limited to Enhanced Subscriber Management, (CHAP, PPP, DHCP, etc.), on Juniper Networks Junos OS devices where RADIUS servers are configured for managing subscriber access and a subscriber is logged in and then requests to logout, the subscriber may be fo...
CVE-2021-31379
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-19
An Incorrect Behavior Order vulnerability in the MAP-E automatic tunneling mechanism of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to send certain malformed IPv4 or IPv6 packets to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) to the PFE on the device which is disabled as a result of the processing of these pac...