Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Sefnit Botnet Swaps Tor for SSH
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
5/1/2014 | 10:47:56 AM
Re: Business and Safeguard standpoint
Facebook's Security Team identified some key files, domains and artifacts and other indictators of compromise for enterprises to be on the lookout for, but these are just a sampling:

https://www.facebook.com/notes/protect-the-graph/sefnit-is-back/1448087102098103
Anthony Schimizzi
50%
50%
Anthony Schimizzi,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/1/2014 | 8:49:42 AM
Re: Business and Safeguard standpoint
User action is required in some way to become infected, whether clicking a link in an email to run the malicious code or more sophisticate like downloading a legitimate video which states you need an updated codec (which is actually the bot code) to view it.  User access control will be one of the first places to look.

Another thing to help the posture of your enterprise network in this scenario would be to granularly inspect traffic outbound at your SDP.  A lot of people really focus on how to prevent and outside attack from emanating and don't put as much attention to what traffic is leaving your network.  A good baseline of operational traffic that will traverse outside the SDP will make your life a lot easier when trying to spot a bump in the wire.  In this case, SSH connections back to a Russian entity.  If a baseline is not in place due to a large amount of public Internet traffic, then alerts and suspicious traffic need to be investigated.  With SSH it can be hard to find that right signal-to-noise ratio for your company.  For example, if you know your company does not have any affiliation with Russia, alerts and notifications from your SIEM should be on your IR/ID team's monitors for SSH traffic or any type of traffic, sourced from inside your network and destined to a Russian ip.

 
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
4/30/2014 | 7:14:38 PM
Business and Safeguard standpoint
Now that Sefnit is using the SSH protocol what are some things to look out for? What I can see from the article is that it hits home for Remote Adminstation that uses SSH. Meaning what are some methods to protect from this and is user action required to become vulnerable or just an SSH protocol? I just want to see if from an Enterprise perspective how this affects, so that plans can be made. 


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/2/2020
Ripple20 Threatens Increasingly Connected Medical Devices
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/30/2020
DDoS Attacks Jump 542% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2020
Dark Reading Staff 6/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-9498
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older may mishandle pointers involved inprocessing data received via RDP static virtual channels. If a userconnects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, a series ofspecially-crafted PDUs could result in memory corruption, possiblyallowing arbitrary code to be executed...
CVE-2020-3282
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition, Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service, and Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attack...
CVE-2020-5909
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, when users run the command displayed in NGINX Controller user interface (UI) to fetch the agent installer, the server TLS certificate is not verified.
CVE-2020-5910
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the Neural Autonomic Transport System (NATS) messaging services in use by the NGINX Controller do not require any form of authentication, so any successful connection would be authorized.
CVE-2020-5911
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the NGINX Controller installer starts the download of Kubernetes packages from an HTTP URL On Debian/Ubuntu system.