Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Sefnit Botnet Swaps Tor for SSH
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
5/1/2014 | 10:47:56 AM
Re: Business and Safeguard standpoint
Facebook's Security Team identified some key files, domains and artifacts and other indictators of compromise for enterprises to be on the lookout for, but these are just a sampling:

https://www.facebook.com/notes/protect-the-graph/sefnit-is-back/1448087102098103
Anthony Schimizzi
50%
50%
Anthony Schimizzi,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/1/2014 | 8:49:42 AM
Re: Business and Safeguard standpoint
User action is required in some way to become infected, whether clicking a link in an email to run the malicious code or more sophisticate like downloading a legitimate video which states you need an updated codec (which is actually the bot code) to view it.  User access control will be one of the first places to look.

Another thing to help the posture of your enterprise network in this scenario would be to granularly inspect traffic outbound at your SDP.  A lot of people really focus on how to prevent and outside attack from emanating and don't put as much attention to what traffic is leaving your network.  A good baseline of operational traffic that will traverse outside the SDP will make your life a lot easier when trying to spot a bump in the wire.  In this case, SSH connections back to a Russian entity.  If a baseline is not in place due to a large amount of public Internet traffic, then alerts and suspicious traffic need to be investigated.  With SSH it can be hard to find that right signal-to-noise ratio for your company.  For example, if you know your company does not have any affiliation with Russia, alerts and notifications from your SIEM should be on your IR/ID team's monitors for SSH traffic or any type of traffic, sourced from inside your network and destined to a Russian ip.

 
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
4/30/2014 | 7:14:38 PM
Business and Safeguard standpoint
Now that Sefnit is using the SSH protocol what are some things to look out for? What I can see from the article is that it hits home for Remote Adminstation that uses SSH. Meaning what are some methods to protect from this and is user action required to become vulnerable or just an SSH protocol? I just want to see if from an Enterprise perspective how this affects, so that plans can be made. 


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/5/2020
How AI and Automation Can Help Bridge the Cybersecurity Talent Gap
Peter Barker, Chief Product Officer at ForgeRock,  6/1/2020
Cybersecurity Spending Hits 'Temporary Pause' Amid Pandemic
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  6/2/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-4229
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
IBM Worklight/MobileFoundation 8.0.0.0 does not properly invalidate session cookies when a user logs out of a session, which could allow another user to gain unauthorized access to a user's session. IBM X-Force ID: 175211.
CVE-2020-4448
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
IBM WebSphere Application Server Network Deployment 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system with a specially-crafted sequence of serialized objects from untrusted sources. IBM X-Force ID: 181228.
CVE-2020-4449
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 traditional could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information with a specially-crafted sequence of serialized objects. IBM X-Force ID: 181230.
CVE-2020-4450
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 and 9.0 traditional could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system with a specially-crafted sequence of serialized objects. IBM X-Force ID: 181231.
CVE-2020-8103
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
A vulnerability in the improper handling of symbolic links in Bitdefender Antivirus Free can allow an unprivileged user to substitute a quarantined file, and restore it to a privileged location. This issue affects Bitdefender Antivirus Free versions prior to 1.0.17.178.