Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Sefnit Botnet Swaps Tor for SSH
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Kelly Jackson Higgins
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
5/1/2014 | 10:47:56 AM
Re: Business and Safeguard standpoint
Facebook's Security Team identified some key files, domains and artifacts and other indictators of compromise for enterprises to be on the lookout for, but these are just a sampling:

https://www.facebook.com/notes/protect-the-graph/sefnit-is-back/1448087102098103
Anthony Schimizzi
Anthony Schimizzi,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/1/2014 | 8:49:42 AM
Re: Business and Safeguard standpoint
User action is required in some way to become infected, whether clicking a link in an email to run the malicious code or more sophisticate like downloading a legitimate video which states you need an updated codec (which is actually the bot code) to view it.  User access control will be one of the first places to look.

Another thing to help the posture of your enterprise network in this scenario would be to granularly inspect traffic outbound at your SDP.  A lot of people really focus on how to prevent and outside attack from emanating and don't put as much attention to what traffic is leaving your network.  A good baseline of operational traffic that will traverse outside the SDP will make your life a lot easier when trying to spot a bump in the wire.  In this case, SSH connections back to a Russian entity.  If a baseline is not in place due to a large amount of public Internet traffic, then alerts and suspicious traffic need to be investigated.  With SSH it can be hard to find that right signal-to-noise ratio for your company.  For example, if you know your company does not have any affiliation with Russia, alerts and notifications from your SIEM should be on your IR/ID team's monitors for SSH traffic or any type of traffic, sourced from inside your network and destined to a Russian ip.

 
RyanSepe
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
4/30/2014 | 7:14:38 PM
Business and Safeguard standpoint
Now that Sefnit is using the SSH protocol what are some things to look out for? What I can see from the article is that it hits home for Remote Adminstation that uses SSH. Meaning what are some methods to protect from this and is user action required to become vulnerable or just an SSH protocol? I just want to see if from an Enterprise perspective how this affects, so that plans can be made. 


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Improving Enterprise Cybersecurity With XDR
Enterprises are looking at eXtended Detection and Response technologies to improve their abilities to detect, and respond to, threats. While endpoint detection and response is not new to enterprise security, organizations have to improve network visibility, expand data collection and expand threat hunting capabilites if they want their XDR deployments to succeed. This issue of Tech Insights also includes: a market overview for XDR from Omdia, questions to ask before deploying XDR, and an XDR primer.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-32284
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-04
Use of insufficiently random values vulnerability exists in Vnet/IP communication module VI461 of YOKOGAWA Wide Area Communication Router (WAC Router) AW810D, which may allow a remote attacker to cause denial-of-service (DoS) condition by sending a specially crafted packet.
CVE-2022-33208
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-04
Authentication bypass by capture-replay vulnerability exists in Machine automation controller NJ series all models V 1.48 and earlier, Machine automation controller NX7 series all models V1.28 and earlier, Machine automation controller NX1 series all models V1.48 and earlier, Automation software 'Sy...
CVE-2022-33948
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-04
HOME SPOT CUBE2 V102 contains an OS command injection vulnerability due to improper processing of data received from DHCP server. An adjacent attacker may execute an arbitrary OS command on the product if a malicious DHCP server is placed on the WAN side of the product.
CVE-2022-33971
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-04
Authentication bypass by capture-replay vulnerability exists in Machine automation controller NX7 series all models V1.28 and earlier, Machine automation controller NX1 series all models V1.48 and earlier, and Machine automation controller NJ series all models V 1.48 and earlier, which may allow an ...
CVE-2022-34151
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-04
Use of hard-coded credentials vulnerability exists in Machine automation controller NJ series all models V 1.48 and earlier, Machine automation controller NX7 series all models V1.28 and earlier, Machine automation controller NX1 series all models V1.48 and earlier, Automation software 'Sysmac Studi...