Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Michaels Data Breach Response: 7 Facts
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Duane T
50%
50%
Duane T,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/23/2014 | 12:01:44 PM
Irony of sharing
While the point made about sharing is valid, the article also states that the malware had never been seen before. Unfortunately, you can't share what you don't know.

On the other hand, there was little information on any lessons about how the undetected malware was found or identified. The follow up on that is that once the malware was found, was that information shared, and how widely is that information available to help other firms avoid a similar breach.

 
Drew Conry-Murray
50%
50%
Drew Conry-Murray,
User Rank: Ninja
4/23/2014 | 10:39:37 AM
Re: Should Michaels have done more?
Presumably Michael's was required to meet PCI standards, which means regular vulnerability assessments were conducted and IDS/IPS systems were in place. But as the article notes, we'll get more bang for the buck by overhauling the payment card system itself rather than trying to get thousands and thousands of retailers to run rock-solid security programs.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
4/23/2014 | 8:44:49 AM
Re: Should Michaels have done more?
Great questions. I hope the answers will be brought to light overtime & help provide a blueprint for the future.. We know from the Target breach that were both ommissions and commissions of best security practices  (See Be Careful Beating Up Target). But the retail industry can learn a lot from the post mortems. 
Robert McDougal
100%
0%
Robert McDougal,
User Rank: Ninja
4/22/2014 | 9:49:05 PM
Should Michaels have done more?
The article quotes Gartner researcher Avivah Litan stating that it is not fair to expect retailers to have expert forensic teams on call at all times.  While I agree with that statement, (forensic teams, if not part of the in house security personnel should be on retainer for incident response) I do think there is a minimum due diligence to which they should be held accountable.  Did Michael's have a CISO in place, security staff, IDS/IPS, vulnerability management, etc?  Did they follow secure coding practices?  Were risk assessments routinely performed on the POS systems?  These are the questions I would like to see answered.

 


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Enterprises Are Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Environment
The adoption of cloud services spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in pressure on cyber-risk professionals to focus on vulnerabilities and new exposures that stem from pandemic-driven changes. Many cybersecurity pros expect fundamental, long-term changes to their organization's computing and data security due to the shift to more remote work and accelerated cloud adoption. Download this report from Dark Reading to learn more about their challenges and concerns.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-0351
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-25
Access of Memory Location Before Start of Buffer in Conda vim prior to 8.2.
CVE-2021-39031
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-25
IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 22.0.0.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to conduct an LDAP injection. By using a specially crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability and could result in in granting permission to unauthorized resources. IBM ...
CVE-2021-46087
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-25
In jfinal_cms >= 5.1 0, there is a storage XSS vulnerability in the background system of CMS. Because developers do not filter the parameters submitted by the user input form, any user with background permission can affect the system security by entering malicious code.
CVE-2021-34865
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-25
This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of multiple NETGEAR routers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the mini_httpd service, which listens on TCP port 80 by default. The issu...
CVE-2021-34866
PUBLISHED: 2022-01-25
This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Linux Kernel 5.14-rc3. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of e...