Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
'Baby Teeth' In Infrastructure Cyber Security Framework
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
JeremiahT680
50%
50%
JeremiahT680,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/15/2014 | 1:07:22 PM
Netowrk Infrastructure
So i came to the conclusion w/ all of the NSA spying that basically it comes down to this. The internet would fail w/o the NSA... basically they have a vested interest in the internet and have exploited vulnerabilities for years.. let alone if they have contingencies for exposure of vulnerabilities.. Its like this... they created it and will always have control of it.. The internet was not created for your amusement.. it was created to transmit secure classified data efficiently is all im saying.. they have spied will spy and probably never quit spying.. thats not opinion... that is fact.. I am totally against them spying on civiliian communications but its nothing new if you look at history..
Frymier
100%
0%
Frymier,
User Rank: Author
4/14/2014 | 7:11:29 PM
Re: Still not enough...
you may be right - the private sector could well lead the way - but remember that a desire to avoid legislation/regualtion is how we got PCI.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
4/14/2014 | 6:01:31 PM
Re: Still not enough...
If the private sector were leading the way and maintaining the cybersecurity infrastructure of our critical infrastructure, why would we need an NIST framework in the first place? 
Marilyn Cohodas
100%
0%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
4/14/2014 | 4:37:07 PM
Re: Still not enough...
Sadly, it will most likely take another incident like a huge blackout -- or worse -- for either the public sector or private sector to take the steps we need to improve the security around our critical infrastructure. But in this political and economic climate, I'm not holding my breathe, either. 
Randy Naramore
100%
0%
Randy Naramore,
User Rank: Ninja
4/14/2014 | 4:08:50 PM
Re: Still not enough...
If securing the infrastructure is going to be done right the private sector will need to lead the charge. The government has too much red-tape to make doing anything quick or right. We need to take the initiative to secure our infrastructure immediately before something really goes wrong.
Paladium
100%
0%
Paladium,
User Rank: Moderator
4/14/2014 | 1:15:14 PM
Still not enough...
The problem is still the complete lack of directive language that has functional meaning.  This NIST document does not contain any directives such as "Thou shalt do X", and its taken them two years or so to reach this point.  The NERC CIP standards are still vague and allows both CI owners/operators and auditors to interpret the meaning of the standards.  FFIEC and GLBA are even worse when it comes to directives.  So as long as CI is treated as a game of politics and budgets, and is left up to personal interpretation by all parties, the risks will continue to grow... until its too late and we have a major incident.  Shame on us!

 


News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-30477
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-15
An issue was discovered in Zulip Server before 3.4. A bug in the implementation of replies to messages sent by outgoing webhooks to private streams meant that an outgoing webhook bot could be used to send messages to private streams that the user was not intended to be able to send messages to.
CVE-2021-30478
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-15
An issue was discovered in Zulip Server before 3.4. A bug in the implementation of the can_forge_sender permission (previously is_api_super_user) resulted in users with this permission being able to send messages appearing as if sent by a system bot, including to other organizations hosted by the sa...
CVE-2021-30479
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-15
An issue was discovered in Zulip Server before 3.4. A bug in the implementation of the all_public_streams API feature resulted in guest users being able to receive message traffic to public streams that should have been only accessible to members of the organization.
CVE-2021-30487
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-15
In the topic moving API in Zulip Server 3.x before 3.4, organization administrators were able to move messages to streams in other organizations hosted by the same Zulip installation.
CVE-2020-36288
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-15
The issue navigation and search view in Jira Server and Data Center before version 8.5.12, from version 8.6.0 before version 8.13.4, and from version 8.14.0 before version 8.15.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript via a DOM Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability caused ...