Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Heartbleed: Examining The Impact
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
macker490
macker490,
User Rank: Ninja
4/13/2014 | 9:12:33 AM
Secure Computing in a Compromised World
the impact is less than you might think:   we all live in a heavilly compromised world due to years of poor practice.

 

i posted some notes on this here:

 

https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/04/friday_squid_bl_419.html#c5430516
tsapio
tsapio,
User Rank: Author
4/12/2014 | 8:35:59 AM
Re: Assessing damage
For maximum security assurance, you should patch all your servers, change all passwords, revoke and reissue all certificates, and consider the impact of everything served by vulnerable systems being compromised. Each company will have to make their own decisions in this regard. As I stated above, there is no way of telling what (if anything) has actually been compromised. It is one of the worst features of this attack, and there is no way to find out retroactively. If it passed through a vulnerable web server, it is potentially compromised.
tsapio
tsapio,
User Rank: Author
4/12/2014 | 8:32:38 AM
Re: Assessing damage
It is theoretically possible to determine by examining server logs that a possible attack has occurred. However, what has been compromised is still going to be almost impossible to determine since what is being compromised is contents of memory adjacent to the buffer that holds the normal heartbeat response. This information is not going to be logged under normal circumstances. It would be extremely memory intensive to do so, and very time consuming to analyze. My recommendation is to close off this hole because it is the easiest and safest course of action.
Thomas Claburn
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Ninja
4/10/2014 | 6:59:53 PM
Re: Assessing damage
Is there any consensus on the need to change passwords? I keep reading differing opinions.
Marilyn Cohodas
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
4/10/2014 | 4:27:47 PM
Assessing damage
Thanks for a fascinating article Tim.  Now that the bug has been identified, going forward I assume it will be easier to tell when a breach has occurred. Or not? 

 


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Practical Network Security Approaches for a Multicloud, Hybrid IT World
The report covers areas enterprises should focus on for their multicloud/hybrid cloud security strategy: -increase visibility over the environment -learning cloud-specific skills -relying on established security frameworks -re-architecting the network
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-30333
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-09
RARLAB UnRAR before 6.12 on Linux and UNIX allows directory traversal to write to files during an extract (aka unpack) operation, as demonstrated by creating a ~/.ssh/authorized_keys file. NOTE: WinRAR and Android RAR are unaffected.
CVE-2022-23066
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-09
In Solana rBPF versions 0.2.26 and 0.2.27 are affected by Incorrect Calculation which is caused by improper implementation of sdiv instruction. This can lead to the wrong execution path, resulting in huge loss in specific cases. For example, the result of a sdiv instruction may decide whether to tra...
CVE-2022-28463
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-08
ImageMagick 7.1.0-27 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow.
CVE-2022-28470
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-08
marcador package in PyPI 0.1 through 0.13 included a code-execution backdoor.
CVE-2022-1620
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-08
NULL Pointer Dereference in function vim_regexec_string at regexp.c:2729 in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4901. NULL Pointer Dereference in function vim_regexec_string at regexp.c:2729 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted input.