Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Carrier IQ Vs. Wiretap Laws
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Freedom Fighter
Freedom Fighter,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/1/2011 | 7:31:01 PM
re: Carrier IQ Vs. Wiretap Laws
"The law gives carriers a lot of leeway in capturing data traveling over their networks, for specifically this reason--quality control--going back to the days of copper wires. So the wiretap laws create exceptions," he said.

But what their software is doing is recording my keystrokes in my phone that may or may not be sent over their network, then covertly sending it to them... even over Wi-fi connections that are NOT THEIR NETWORK. They are recording my notepad entries, calender entries, grocery lists.

Paint is grey if you wish, but it is still black and white.
fredaevans
fredaevans,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/1/2011 | 7:28:03 PM
re: Carrier IQ Vs. Wiretap Laws
True to a degree. If you have your phone turned on the nearest cell phone tower is tracking its location. It's not so much that it's 'gathering' information, but knowing where you are for incoming calls.
DHOOVER079
DHOOVER079,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/1/2011 | 7:27:07 PM
re: Carrier IQ Vs. Wiretap Laws
if
fredaevans
fredaevans,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/1/2011 | 7:21:41 PM
re: Carrier IQ Vs. Wiretap Laws
I'm not too sure if there really is any violation of 'wire tapping' here. This system operates off of cell phones and the like (millions in use at any given time). Once you hit 'send' on a cell phone it becomes a 'radio transmitter' to a cell phone tower (then into a land line?) There was a big stink years back as you could easily build a set that would intercept any call being made in close proximity. Also (as I understand same) the 'wire tap' laws for land lines vs cell phone numbers is not the same; in one case a specific phone number. The other 'any number' an individual may use.

One way or the other this will get interesting.
fae
nightmage80
nightmage80,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/1/2011 | 7:04:42 PM
re: Carrier IQ Vs. Wiretap Laws
Also... why is the phone company allowed to spy on us? Does the wiretapping law really extend to data usage as well or is that just implied and untested?
KPICKERING000
KPICKERING000,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/1/2011 | 6:51:29 PM
re: Carrier IQ Vs. Wiretap Laws
It's worth noting that Eckhart discovered that CarrierIQ tracks and captures data travelling over Wi-Fi, i.e., data not part of any carrier network. It even captures data when the phone isn't connected to any network at all. If that's not a violation of the law, then the law is written too narrowly.
skyhawk83
skyhawk83,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/1/2011 | 6:47:13 PM
re: Carrier IQ Vs. Wiretap Laws
Well...I guess the hackers are going to have fun with this one.
Psyanomaly
Psyanomaly,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/1/2011 | 6:27:59 PM
re: Carrier IQ Vs. Wiretap Laws
Just a thought.... I wonder if the data collected, in its transmission is also counting against the users data plan.
<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Incorporating a Prevention Mindset into Threat Detection and Response
Threat detection and response systems, by definition, are reactive because they have to wait for damage to be done before finding the attack. With a prevention-mindset, security teams can proactively anticipate the attacker's next move, rather than reacting to specific threats or trying to detect the latest techniques in real-time. The report covers areas enterprises should focus on: What positive response looks like. Improving security hygiene. Combining preventive actions with red team efforts.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-1268
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-23
The Donate Extra WordPress plugin through 2.02 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the response, leading to a Reflected cross-Site Scripting
CVE-2022-1298
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-23
The Tabs WordPress plugin before 2.2.8 does not sanitise and escape Tab descriptions, which could allow high privileged users with a role as low as editor to perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed
CVE-2022-1320
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-23
The Sliderby10Web WordPress plugin before 1.2.52 does not properly sanitize and escape some of its settings, which could allow high-privileged users such as admin to perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when unfiltered_html is disallowed
CVE-2022-1547
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-23
The Check &amp; Log Email WordPress plugin before 1.0.6 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in an attribute in an admin page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting
CVE-2022-1558
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-23
The Curtain WordPress plugin through 1.0.2 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed