Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Top Advice for CISOs
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
praneeth.goud
50%
50%
praneeth.goud,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/15/2015 | 3:33:23 AM
Re: Changing our approach
nice information thank you
Sara Peters
100%
0%
Sara Peters,
User Rank: Author
4/2/2014 | 11:15:49 AM
Re: Changing our approach
@RyanSepe  Budgets are NEVER simple, and you're right: no matter what department you're in you won't necessarily get the money you need/deserve, even if you use the budget you have perfectly. However, it is a useful exercise to ask yourself what you could be doing differently with the budget you have before you ask for more money.
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
4/1/2014 | 3:30:50 PM
Re: Changing our approach
I think this might be the case to some extent. However, even if you express the importance of security and it is well received within your organization that doesn't mean that you will necessarily be provided the funds needed. Remember, that where security professionals express the needs for security there are other business endeavors that may also take precendence from other types of professionals. For example from a healthcare perspective, if a new heart monitor needs to be incorporated and funds are being divided to support that endeavor it may be difficult to acquire the funds needed for security.

The main point that I am trying to make is that even if the security aspect is acknowledged we need to remember that organizations are multi-faceted and that its not just a matter of yes budget approved, no budget denied. Or y amount of dollars to go to x security. Its a balance of y total dollars, then x to security and z to marketing and w to clincial and not necessarily that funds are being improperly used. It may be slightly more complicated. Thoughts?
Sara Peters
50%
50%
Sara Peters,
User Rank: Author
4/1/2014 | 10:38:32 AM
Re: Changing our approach
@tmccreight  As you say, "it's interesting to see how your position in an organization can change if you focus on supporting the business and become an enabler, instead of someone who can only say 'no.'"

One thing I wasn't able to include in the video was something else that Andy Ellis from Akamai said. I asked him about budget. And he said that if you feel like you don't have enough budget, then you're probably not spending what you have well. You're not showing the value of security and of your department, and you're not supporting the business. And if you started doing a better job of those things, your budget would increase. Do you think that's the case?
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
3/31/2014 | 7:57:33 PM
Re: Changing our approach
tmccreight, I agree very much with your statement that points need to be delineated in a manner that is clearly understable to all. There is an element that is lost in translation when you are overly technical and I think the gravity of most situations can be better grasped with simplicity. 

Also, there needs to be a balance between yes-Security, no-Security and cosi-cosi security. I think the business plan and policies here is what will guide security decisions here. What is the overall goal? How to be secure while maintaining workflow, things of this nature.

My biggest interest in the video was with the technical engineer from Rapid7, in regards to his statement about the holistic view. What are peoples thoughts on; Do we want the best security tools from different vendors (possibly not purchased all at once) or is the benefit in one vendor many tools? Some times the different tools from multiple vendors may not mesh as well but singularly they can be quite an asset; whereas, tools all under one brand may mesh fantastically together but may not perform as well as the industry leaders. Thoughts to this?
tmccreight
50%
50%
tmccreight,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/31/2014 | 2:34:32 PM
Changing our approach
I really enjoyed the comments from Richard and Andy in the video.  I can relate to their comments and truly believe if all a CISO can do is talk about jargon and risks at a technical level, they will never be truly appreciated by their business peers.

We need to hone our communication skills and speak to business in their terms.  It's a tough skill to master, but when you begin focusing your message at a business level, you'll see a far different response from business leaders.  I've watched it - it's interesting to see how your position in an organization can change if you focus on supporting the business and become an enabler, instead of someone who can only say "no".


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...