Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Security Teams Need Better Intel, More Offense
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Apprentice
4/27/2012 | 6:23:24 AM
re: Security Teams Need Better Intel, More Offense
Prescott Small
Prescott Small,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2012 | 3:54:48 PM
re: Security Teams Need Better Intel, More Offense
-While I agree with much of the article the idea of doing anything to get the
attention of attackers is a bad one.- I spent the majority of last year
researching many of the concepts in this artcile and published the reults in a
peer reviewed paper through SANS.org titled:

Defense in
Depth: An Impractical Strategy For a Cyber
World [ISBN: 1469934922]



For one, a
Counter-attack would not be legal and secondly the ethics of a counter attack
would be questionable at best. Thirdly, at the minimum, counter attacking would
not be cost effective or practical for those practicing Cyber-Defense with their
existing challenges and strained resources. A counter attack from the public
sector would not have a return on investment, would likely result in escalation
of the attack and increase costs with little to no measurable benefit for the
effort. For evidence of this opinion one need only take a look at the reactions
from groups like Anonymous and their attacks against HB Gary or PayPal. There is
no profit in provocation. (Associated Press, 2011; Goodin, 2011; Lennon, 2011;
McMillan, 2011)
User Rank: Ninja
4/25/2012 | 1:49:53 AM
re: Security Teams Need Better Intel, More Offense
But targeting attackers can easily backfire, he warned. If attackers are staging attacks from another company's servers, for example, defenders who attack back can damage an innocent party's server and are putting themselves in legal jeopardy."
Good point here.-
Brian Prince, InformationWeek/Dark Reading Comment Moderator

I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Black Hat USA 2022 Attendee Report
Black Hat attendees are not sleeping well. Between concerns about attacks against cloud services, ransomware, and the growing risks to the global supply chain, these security pros have a lot to be worried about. Read our 2022 report to hear what they're concerned about now.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
There is a code injection vulnerability in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.8.1 and below that may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to pass strings which could potentially cause arbitrary code execution in a victims browser.
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
In Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 10.8.1, a system property is not properly encrypted. This may lead to a local user reading sensitive information from a properties file.
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
A stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Esri Portal for ArcGIS may allow a remote, authenticated attacker to pass and store malicious strings via crafted queries which when accessed could potentially execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the userâ€â&b...
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
Apache Airflow Docker's Provider prior to 3.0.0 shipped with an example DAG that was vulnerable to (authenticated) remote code exploit of code on the Airflow worker host.
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-16
The Emerson ROC and FloBoss RTU product lines through 2022-05-02 perform insecure filesystem operations. They utilize the ROC protocol (4000/TCP, 5000/TCP) for communications between a master terminal and RTUs. Opcode 203 of this protocol allows a master terminal to transfer files to and from the fl...