Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Security Teams Need Better Intel, More Offense
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Apprentice
4/27/2012 | 6:23:24 AM
re: Security Teams Need Better Intel, More Offense
Prescott Small
Prescott Small,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2012 | 3:54:48 PM
re: Security Teams Need Better Intel, More Offense
-While I agree with much of the article the idea of doing anything to get the
attention of attackers is a bad one.- I spent the majority of last year
researching many of the concepts in this artcile and published the reults in a
peer reviewed paper through SANS.org titled:

Defense in
Depth: An Impractical Strategy For a Cyber
World [ISBN: 1469934922]



For one, a
Counter-attack would not be legal and secondly the ethics of a counter attack
would be questionable at best. Thirdly, at the minimum, counter attacking would
not be cost effective or practical for those practicing Cyber-Defense with their
existing challenges and strained resources. A counter attack from the public
sector would not have a return on investment, would likely result in escalation
of the attack and increase costs with little to no measurable benefit for the
effort. For evidence of this opinion one need only take a look at the reactions
from groups like Anonymous and their attacks against HB Gary or PayPal. There is
no profit in provocation. (Associated Press, 2011; Goodin, 2011; Lennon, 2011;
McMillan, 2011)
User Rank: Ninja
4/25/2012 | 1:49:53 AM
re: Security Teams Need Better Intel, More Offense
But targeting attackers can easily backfire, he warned. If attackers are staging attacks from another company's servers, for example, defenders who attack back can damage an innocent party's server and are putting themselves in legal jeopardy."
Good point here.-
Brian Prince, InformationWeek/Dark Reading Comment Moderator

7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
A XSS Vulnerability in /uploads/dede/action_search.php in DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 allows an authenticated user to execute remote arbitrary code via the keyword parameter.
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows a remote attacker to send a malicious request to to the web manager allowing remote code execution.
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The Linux kernel before 5.11.14 has a use-after-free in cipso_v4_genopt in net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c because the CIPSO and CALIPSO refcounting for the DOI definitions is mishandled, aka CID-ad5d07f4a9cd. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
In the Linux kernel before 5.12.4, net/bluetooth/hci_event.c has a use-after-free when destroying an hci_chan, aka CID-5c4c8c954409. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The block subsystem in the Linux kernel before 5.2 has a use-after-free that can lead to arbitrary code execution in the kernel context and privilege escalation, aka CID-c3e2219216c9. This is related to blk_mq_free_rqs and blk_cleanup_queue.