Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

1/14/2008
07:35 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Locking Down the Multifunction Printer

Sharp has added change control to better secure its networked printers, but some experts say more software isn't the answer

Most everyone knows networked multifunction printers can pose a dangerous weak link within an enterprise, but not everyone agrees on just how to secure them.

Printer manufacturer Sharp upped the ante recently by adding Solidcore Systems' change control software to its server-powered MX Series printers and multifunction peripherals that run Windows XP Embedded. The software helps stop unauthorized code from running on Sharp devices and prevents unauthorized configuration changes. Sharp previously had relied on antivirus scans to keep the devices clean, but scans and their updates sapped performance and couldn't detect zero-day attacks.

Networked printers connected to the Internet are at risk from the same security threats as servers and desktop machines, says Hiromu Yoshimoto, a member of Sharp's software development department. Sharp implemented the new software on printers at its customer Circle K's convenience stores.

"As the multifunction printers are delivered to various places like convenience stores, the systems can be vulnerable to users installing unauthorized software and applications on the printers," Yoshimoto says. "The printer vendor [wants] to control what software can run on the systems, block unauthorized software from being installed, and limit the patching cycles needed for the printers."

Sharp is just one of several printer vendors that Solidcore is courting with its change control software. "We're in talks with others," says Jim Sarale, vice president of embedded solutions for Solidcore, who says the networked printer can be a weak link in the network. "We are one big attack away from these [devices] not getting forgotten" anymore, he says. "All it would take is a zero-day attack or a well intentioned but unauthorized change to one of the devices."

Embedded change control software such as Solidcore's S3 Control Embedded is the next wave of security for these devices, says Sharp's Yoshimoto. "With change control installed as a foundation of these systems, other security measures such as antivirus are no longer needed," he says.

Printer vulnerabilities haven't traditionally been top enterprise security priorities, but they are getting more attention as organizations realize how these boxes can get hacked. A researcher recently found what he called a cross-site printing vulnerability -- a way to remotely hack printers using JavaScript to use the printer as a conduit for spam. (See Printers Could Be Vulnerable to Spam.)

Meanwhile, Robert Graham, CEO of Errata Security, notes that it's unlikely that attackers would purposely target a printer. "However, more and more of them contain Windows XP Embedded. This means that hackers might break into it thinking it's a normal Windows desktop computer without even realizing it's a printer," he says. "Thus, while normally I would suggest that only paranoid organizations [such as DOD and intelligence organizations] worry about their printers, it has now become something that all organizations need to worry about."

Change control software in general isn't necessarily the solution, Graham argues. "The problem with change control software is that they either all allow too much change, which means an update will introduce a bug that disables the device, or too little [and] it gets hacked into anyway. There is no 'just right' amount of change," he says.

Graham recommends hardening embedded devices like printers by doing things like turning off default accounts. "Most embedded operating systems come with default passwords that allow anybody to connect to the device," he says.

Security researcher Brendan O'Connor, who at the 2006 Black Hat USA briefings uncovered key vulnerabilities in Xerox's printers, is also skeptical of adding another layer of software to secure printers. (See Print at Your Own Risk.)

"If we take a step back and look at the real problem, the issue is that software has security vulnerabilities," he says. "Does it make sense to add more software to mitigate the issue or to fix the buggy code that's already there? I would argue the latter makes more sense."

O'Connor says multifunction device makers just need to do what the rest of the software industry must do: fix the software.

Solidcore's Sarale, meanwhile, says his company's software only allows the authorized "image" of the printer software to execute, and it also replaces the need for AV scans that printers such as Sharp had used previously. "Blocking worms and Trojans is one of the things [the S3 software] does," he says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • Solidcore Systems Inc.
  • Sharp Electronics Corp.
  • Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT) Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    44% of Security Threats Start in the Cloud
    Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/19/2020
    Zero-Factor Authentication: Owning Our Data
    Nick Selby, Chief Security Officer at Paxos Trust Company,  2/19/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
    This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
    Flash Poll
    How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
    How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
    The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-8818
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-25
    An issue was discovered in the CardGate Payments plugin through 2.0.30 for Magento 2. Lack of origin authentication in the IPN callback processing function in Controller/Payment/Callback.php allows an attacker to remotely replace critical plugin settings (merchant ID, secret key, etc.) and therefore...
    CVE-2020-8819
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-25
    An issue was discovered in the CardGate Payments plugin through 3.1.15 for WooCommerce. Lack of origin authentication in the IPN callback processing function in cardgate/cardgate.php allows an attacker to remotely replace critical plugin settings (merchant ID, secret key, etc.) and therefore bypass ...
    CVE-2020-9385
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-25
    A NULL Pointer Dereference exists in libzint in Zint 2.7.1 because multiple + characters are mishandled in add_on in upcean.c, when called from eanx in upcean.c during EAN barcode generation.
    CVE-2020-9382
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-24
    An issue was discovered in the Widgets extension through 1.4.0 for MediaWiki. Improper title sanitization allowed for the execution of any wiki page as a widget (as defined by this extension) via MediaWiki's } parser function.
    CVE-2020-1938
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-24
    When using the Apache JServ Protocol (AJP), care must be taken when trusting incoming connections to Apache Tomcat. Tomcat treats AJP connections as having higher trust than, for example, a similar HTTP connection. If such connections are available to an attacker, they can be exploited in ways that ...